How this can be f****ing possible ?

[kebess]

Almost had my own troll results yesterday, by conceding my second goal of the season to as crappy team.. Luckily, I still managed to win :





He scored first at only 14min in. I could only get back the lead quite late in the game - go figure.

I wonder how he was even able to score with my defense, which included a blue arrowed DMC.........

[July Fourth]

Almost had my own troll results yesterday, by conceding my second goal of the season to as crappy team.. Luckily, I still managed to win :





He scored first at only 14min in. I could only get back the lead quite late in the game - go figure.

I wonder how he was even able to score with my defense, which included a blue arrowed DMC.........

Thats not a troll result, 4-3N-3 works well vs 4-5-1 V

[kebess]

Thats not a troll result, 4-3N-3 works well vs 4-5-1 V

Why?
--

[dv8r]

Why?
--

Do not question the game engine. I have tried 4-5-1v against the 4-3N-3 many times and got negative results.

This game engine has no logical sense, I wouldn't worry about why and how it counters it lol.

[kebess]

Do not question the game engine. I have tried 4-5-1v against the 4-3N-3 many times and got negative results.

This game engine has no logical sense, I wouldn't worry about why and how it counters it lol.

I see, : ) I guess this puts an end to the discussion !
I'm a rather logical person, so I can't really function otherwise. Guess, I'll just swing by it...

Middle field tied up

I put a lot of importance in midfield control, and usually I make sure to have at least one more man in that area of the field exactly to have an edge. I guess, in this case, I underestimated my opponent so much that I just wanted to score 10+ goals, by attacking the flanks, and not worry to much about the rest... namely, the midfield control.

[kebess]

Thats not a troll result, 4-3N-3 works well vs 4-5-1 V

By the way, I just saw this on your sticky formation guide :

4-3-3

--ST--ST--ST--
----------------
--MC--MC--MC--
----------------
DL--DC--DC--DR

4-3-3 is an attacking formation that many managers like to use especially those that just like to fill their team with tons of strikers, however its very weak in the midfield and again formations like 3-5-2, 4-5-1 V and even 4-4-2 Classic should be able to beat this.

Is your guide completely out of date and should be unstickied, or you're simply and totally contradicting yourself here ?

[July Fourth]

By the way, I just saw this on your sticky formation guide :



Is your guide completely out of date and should be unstickied, or you're simply and totally contradicting yourself here ?

That was wrote when we had no idea that 4-5-1 V was getting owned by 4-3-3. I've edited it.

[Barnes10]

Thats not a troll result, 4-3N-3 works well vs 4-5-1 V

Why ? And there should be no formation that works well against another formation by default.

[cracicot]

Why ? And there should be no formation that works well against another formation by default.

Can you justify that statement?

Every attack has a defense that can nullify it, while every defense has an attack that can nullify it. It is just a matter of finding it out.

[dv8r]

Can you justify that statement?

Every attack has a defense that can nullify it, while every defense has an attack that can nullify it. It is just a matter of finding it out.

This.

Also you guys should understand that being the stronger team doesn't always mean you WILL win. However, I think the game has gotten to the stage where weaker teams are becoming overpowered and are beating far superior teams too frequently. It's getting rather ridiculous now.