Any advice about this troll result ?

It's even worse when you lose 3 - 0 against a team with 39.8Q even though you have 55.7Q.

kaka 30%-70% but still wins, virtual too? :D :cool:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by duchao

kaka 30%-70% but still wins, virtual too? :D :cool:

---

even 20-80 like chelsea still win uefalona lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Marc Symons

There is no such things as counter formations. It's about buying the right players and utilising them correctly.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

---

Dont call them counter formations then, call them formations that work better vs specific formations. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. based on this logic, there is a perfect "counter" for every formation. You just have to know what it is. Funny becuase I saw several results today where narrow diamond lost to 4-4-2 classic. Seems that it is not the perfect coutner for it anymore, but i still see that it works most of the time. I guess your coutner depends on your instructions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rastaman70

Dont call them counter formations then, call them formations that work better vs specific formations. For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. based on this logic, there is a perfect "counter" for every formation. You just have to know what it is. Funny becuase I saw several results today where narrow diamond lost to 4-4-2 classic. Seems that it is not the perfect coutner for it anymore, but i still see that it works most of the time. I guess your coutner depends on your instructions.

---

442 has no counter. put red arrow in RLM, play Wing attack short passing. you'll see what am i saying

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tongly45

442 has no counter. put red arrow in RLM, play Wing attack short passing. you'll see what am i saying

---

I beat 4-4-2 regularly playing 4-5-1, or 4-1-3wide-1-1 up the middle. i think that it is one of the ones that works better vs 4-4-2 but not all the time. 3-1-4-2 was like that for me as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rastaman70

I beat 4-4-2 regularly playing 4-5-1, or 4-1-3wide-1-1 up the middle. i think that it is one of the ones that works better vs 4-4-2 but not all the time. 3-1-4-2 was like that for me as well.

---

try with an actice manager same star(not quality) of the best 11. see if you can win more than 50%. 442 has a weak point at the center but not really see a tatic should counter it

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by tongly45

try with an actice manager same star(not quality) of the best 11. see if you can win more than 50%. 442 has a weak point at the center but not really see a tatic should counter it

---

i wouldn't say the weakness is the middle. They say the same about 4-3N-3 having weak flanks, however the correct approach is to attack through the middle.

It really depends on the quality and I'm very sceptical about counter formations. I generally use my best formation that I can use and that tends to work for me.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by dv8r

i wouldn't say the weakness is the middle. They say the same about 4-3N-3 having weak flanks, however the correct approach is to attack through the middle.

It really depends on the quality and I'm very sceptical about counter formations. I generally use my best formation that I can use and that tends to work for me.

---

i used 442 hexagonal and alway won. but i have never face a similar quality team. i don't really know

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by kynan

I was trolled 1-0 today in the Champs League.

Just got to suck it up and see if I can overturn it on Tuesday. My team is vastly superior but I don't hold much hope at the moment.

---

In reply to this, I played my second leg of this game today, the game falling just 40 mins after I had played in the League, without me being able to watch the game and I won 4-0.

Just goes to show that occasionally the troll result will come regardless of what you have done to prevent it. In this situation, all is well that ends well as I progress 4-1 on agg.