who programs this crap without testing it?

[rastaman70]

I cant stand the amateurism at nordeus. Seriously.

They put in this new info screen:

preferred formation 4-4-2
style: Attacking

OK, thats....ok, but I havent used 4-4-2 but for a few times in 16 seasons. I always counter the opponent and that means that 4-4-2 classic is RARELY used.

That means that the $%^@%#%'s that programmed this are WRONG! What info are they using for this? Whatever info they are using is just plain WRONG!

and please dont tell me its for this season, as I have been using various formations and never 4-4-2 this season.

TYPICAL NORDEUS...just bad.

[Saransh Vatsa]

In the auto-set formation screen, 4-1-2-1-2 ND is named 4-5-1.......

[July Fourth]

Mine shows 4-5-1, Hard attacking, although my main formations are 3N-1-4-2 and 3-5-2 V

[BigB79]

So is this another great new Nordeus addition to the game that turns out to be pile of crap?

[Sxrenity]

It's just a simple bug.

Mine says I play 4-4-2 with hard attacking which is wrong.

I assume it'll get fixed with the next update, it's nothing major.

Please keep these threads constructive, I've noticed quite a few users have been making threads nit picking the smallest things & basically just using them as an excuse to slang against Nordeus.

I'm not defending them in any way/shape or form as I don't work for them, but these threads are rapidly degrading the forum & it's getting hard to find anything remotely constructive.

I'm all for freedom of speech but c'mon guys.

[rastaman70]

It's just a simple bug.

Mine says I play 4-4-2 with hard attacking which is wrong.

I assume it'll get fixed with the next update, it's nothing major.

Please keep these threads constructive, I've noticed quite a few users have been making threads nit picking the smallest things & basically just using them as an excuse to slang against Nordeus.

I'm not defending them in any way/shape or form as I don't work for them, but these threads are rapidly degrading the forum & it's getting hard to find anything remotely constructive.

I'm all for freedom of speech but c'mon guys.

Since when does everything on here have to be constructive? you said yourself, freedom of speech and they have to expect that some people are going to be unhappy with the game and/or the company. This forum is to discuss all aspects of the game and everything connected to it, bad or good...am I wrong? If I am, then this is a freedom of speech issue and you are on the wrong side.

you just cant censor everything to make Nordeus look like an angel, because that would be denying the truth. we have to point out the inconsistencies and errors or they will never get rectified.

and one more thing...you dont know it will be fixed...ever. you only speculate that it will be addressed, but then how long did it take to fix friendlies???

[Sxrenity]

Since when does everything on here have to be constructive? you said yourself, freedom of speech and they have to expect that some people are going to be unhappy with the game and/or the company. This forum is to discuss all aspects of the game and everything connected to it, bad or good...am I wrong? If I am, then this is a freedom of speech issue and you are on the wrong side.

you just cant censor everything to make Nordeus look like an angel, because that would be denying the truth. we have to point out the inconsistencies and errors or they will never get rectified.

and one more thing...you dont know it will be fixed...ever. you only speculate that it will be addressed, but then how long did it take to fix friendlies???

'Who programs this crap' - it's not a good start is it?

Well techically, if something isn't constructive, it's against the rules if you read them.

Fair enough about the point about all things positive AND negative having value, but when literally all of your threads are bashing the game, no matter how small or irrelevant the problem, it raises two questions;

1) If you are really that unhappy with the game, then why play it? I have yet to see a positive post from you - even when other members post a thread about something going wrong, eg; results/player performance/bugs etc. you don't offer help, you just add to the frustration with your 'there's no hope, the game sucks' responses.

2) If these threads are just a way of you venting frustration with the game, then why not collate them all in a rolling thread, ie. Rastaman's vent thread, I'd certainly approve that.

I don't know if it is just me, but these threads are seriously putting a negative light on the forums - it all just seems like one huge vent thread.

I'll try and put to the admins about approving a new vent thread, then you can flame to your hearts content

I mean no offence by this, but I play the game just like you, and I probably spend quite a bit more than you on tokens; I've got more to lose when things go wrong in terms of investment - when things like this happen I try to engage with Nordeus in a more amicable, civil way - when you consistently call the developers incompetent I'm not surprised they're not keen on directly responding, it seems like there's just no pleasing you.

The update regarding the team stats added to the game.

I admit it currently has bugs, but it was better than having no additional features at all.

You need to remember that unlike console/PC games there isn't any 'beta function' with top eleven, they have to release things and address the bugs at later points once they are discovered - the whole transfer market was a huge beta until they attempted a fix, which I'll hold my hands up and agree, was one big fail.

[Gary Anderson]

This is my 3-4-3 formation




Personaly i would believe that was a 4-3-1-2 formation but might be wrong

[Qambu Yaasi]

LOL seriously? It bugs ppl? I don't really pay much attention to it. It is after all a web/mobile game.

[Celtic]

I actually thought the same, "what"?

My favourite tactic is 4-1-2-1-2.