The Vent Thread #3 + Latest Discussions Index

[nyfutty]

I don't understand why people say "stupid results, I'm quitting" after they lose a game against a weaker team..
Crystal Palace which is battling relegation in the premier league just beat Chelsea 1-0 and Chelsea is one of the best teams in the world and this is in REAL LIFE. Chelsea beat PSG 2-0 but barley beat Swansea City 1-0 a few days later (even though Swansea City only had 10 men). THIS IS FOOTBALL, even if you have the best team in the world, it's impossible to win every game. Just because you lost against a weaker team doesn't mean the game is broken.. It makes the game realistic because even the strongest teams lose in real life.

ok yet another silly result for me today, top of the league loses, at home to weaker opposition, but the startling thing about this game was i logged on just before half time to see i had scored a goal, but had no shots on target, hmmm is that real life too lol. even the shot success rate was 0. not the first time this has happened ive scored 4 goals with 3 shots on target before and been given 133% success, which i pointed out before is impossible.

this is the reason I get annoyed by the game, not so much losing , but there is no logic in the figures the stupid computer spits out. i see all the time teams with 20% possession, but they have a much higher pass success rate, again not logically possible in any scenario whatsoever. i also see weak teams getting shock wins 3-0 or 2-0, not likely with 20% possession. a team can sneak a game 1-0 or 2-1 then defend the lead, but not win 3-0 that isnt real life.

the game is not far from being right, but nobody seems to be fixing the faults or owning up to them. its basic stuff im sure for a computer to know you cannot have a goal and not have some success rate of shooting. pic included to prove the point