Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19
Like Tree21Likes

Thread: Youth Academy Player and Training Speed Nerf Exposed...:D...

  1. #11
    Apprentice Catalin Joel's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Timisoara, Romania.
    Posts
    278
    Wow great to see people really involved and sharing tips with all for the sake of the entire community!
    Last edited by Catalin Joel; 08-12-2014 at 07:42 AM.

  2. #12
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    17
    youth players are waste of time. if i'd have known the dross that comes out I would never have bothered building it

  3. #13
    Addicted Philip L. Willis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    699
    Brilliant Post! Kudos!

    Hard stats!
    In football it is better to be Lucky than Good.

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lucknow, INDIA
    Posts
    2,895
    Quote Originally Posted by Buffs Mad View Post
    I would broadly endorse Sid's findings except for the last one.


    • The next star drop in gain I'm seeing was what I expected from reading other posts. No idea if there has been an overall nerf to speed because I have no access to historic data.

    The have NERF the speed its 100% conform because earlier a fast trainer easily managed more than 40/80/120......
    Buffs Mad likes this.

  5. #15
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,270
    Quote Originally Posted by Siddharth Shanker Singh View Post
    The have NERF the speed its 100% conform because earlier a fast trainer easily managed more than 40/80/120......
    Happy to accept that, I just can't confirm it because I can replicate the past. I've a hunch its not a nerf to the actual values but rather a nerf to the range of possible values - the highs still look as high but more lows are creeping in imo.

    But a nerf is a nerf.

  6. #16
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lucknow, INDIA
    Posts
    2,895
    Quote Originally Posted by Buffs Mad View Post
    Happy to accept that, I just can't confirm it because I can replicate the past. I've a hunch its not a nerf to the actual values but rather a nerf to the range of possible values - the highs still look as high but more lows are creeping in imo.

    But a nerf is a nerf.
    Hahahaha...One of the long standing member of the forum had told me that when the game started the average speed for a fast trainer used to 180 for Hard Practice Match......

  7. #17
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Plymouth, United Kingdom
    Posts
    179
    quite interesting but i think il stick to selling the free one and keep looking out for fast training 18 yo 5*players and probably cheaper in tokens too.
    gazza likes this.

  8. #18
    English Forum Moderator Cat Harrison's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    StL
    Posts
    8,062
    The best speed I have gotten is 160. Ever. and 158 this season.. both times on a 3*. so I haven't seen much change in the amount of green packs I budget to train them, that is, a cone a green/ 3 cones all hard training, until ticking over to 4. I have records in a notebook and I checked.. maybe they have slowed a tiny bit?
    Expressed above is my own opinion. Your results may vary.
    ▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB
    < ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  9. #19
    VIP Buffs Mad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Scotland
    Posts
    3,270
    Best I've noticed is 175 on 4* (best I've recorded on that guy is 171) - worst that same guy has achieved is 108, still Match Hard.

    He has also achieved a higher gain on Cardio (119) than on Match Practice almost immediately after (111). Several players show this - no idea how frequently it happened in the past as I can't comment on what I don't see (unless I don't have any data at all then I'm happy to comment on anything).

    Thats why I question the range of values because I hadn't noticed such a wide range before this. If the range of possible random values was lowered at the lower end it would after all give a lower average.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12