Buying good players?? - what's my mistake??

[khris]

no, example of this season :
I bought 5 fast trainers
took the two defenders (who are usually good performers, specially if they are DC or DL/dDC, find in which def. position perform better)
power train them (give sp or special ability)
don't use them in (at least the critical) games for 3-4 days
took my AMC, test him as ST and MC - nt bad, so I power-train him and gave him those positions
I didn't use him in games while I was doing that
I bought 1 DMC, test him in MC position also. Not bad rate (2 7s) so I gave him MC position too.
I bought 1 MC, test him, he was a flop. I didn't power -train him at all. So, even if I gave him chances to prove, now I have him in negotiation list for selling.
I sign an academy player, test him. He got 7-9-8-9. Ok, good. So I decided to invest on him. Start power-training, he injured two times, used him in some games, he lost his form, now he got two 7s. Few training more and relaxing for 3-4 days till I 'm gonna use him again.
My MC
good trainer, either feet, but


* anyone interesting for him ?

not true. I have seen managers with the bare minimum full of scouts with SA and they clean up the league without rotation, simply because they dont have players to rotate.

I have to say I'm agree coz I always defend in this forum that this game is not too developed to make players change suddely... I always defend a "lineal" performance due internal % of proggramming that don't have tendence to change 1 day to another suddenly...


Ok.. now I will try to explain the pic LOL