Last edited by shwanko07; 03-10-2013 at 04:37 PM.
my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
Cup: Winner (S3)
I think that will encourage managers to spend more imo bcz the challenge is so close at every single game and you need to up your game more and improve the side
you are just saying the above statement out of anger
winning by targeting small sides, is like bullying , targeting them only bcz you are bigger and older... but chickening out facing people of the same size
my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
Cup: Winner (S3)
That's the point, if everyone is at the same quality rating, I don't need to buy any tokens. Why spend money when I don't need when the players at the same level don't spend players like I do.
If were not going back to the old system, then I would like the see July Fourth's version next season.
Los Angeles FC
"The Black Lions"
Seven Seasons: 7 League Titles, 6 Champions League Titles, 2 Cup Titles (& 3 Cup Runner Up Trophies)
Btw, this new system encourages players to collect the worst players and stack them on the bench so we get drawn in easier cups. Pretty bad marketing strategy Nordeous...
my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
Cup: Winner (S3)
my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
Cup: Winner (S3)
Ok I figure it out, in my other team not connected with facebook I keep this one just for filling time ( I do not spend money with it) at the end of the season I had a bunch of 1* and 2* that I didn t want to renew(obviously) and the cup I was draw is very similar in level.....but now that I dismissed those players (7) and replaced them with old but 4 & 5* I am above lots of team in the cup( at least for now) too bad I do not really care of this team but I will beneficiate of the format .... Untill tokens buyer kick in
It's defeats the purpose of those who spend money in this game for seasons now and those who casually play. Doesn't matter now, I already submitted a suggestion ticket like the rest of us had. Thus it will fixed in the next season with a different format. If you're a level four team you should be facing teams between levels 2-5. If you want to win, spend the token and play an effective tactical game.
When I won my second cup as a level two team, I beat three teams at level 5 and a team at level 6. Thus just at a competitive level, even if I'm the underdog in those four games in the knockout round, I have to spend to win the cup.
However, it should be the FA cup format. Where the draw is completely random with the chance of tougher teams facing each other early and the lower level teams have the chance to face each other and advance deep in the cup.
That how things should be like. Regardless a new format is needed.
Los Angeles FC
"The Black Lions"
Seven Seasons: 7 League Titles, 6 Champions League Titles, 2 Cup Titles (& 3 Cup Runner Up Trophies)
I bet you if we put it to a ballot of what system we should use, the old system we disbanded last season, the new current quality system or my suggested system where cups are held in level 'bands of 4 levels' and once you win promotion in the league 4 times you move up to the next level band for cups, my suggestion would win because its fairer to normal players and token buyers and it still gives a proper cup feel and it would designed to eliminate stupid matches such as L2 v L15, L3 v L20 etc.
New Current System - Unfair on token buyers
Old System - Had pointless preliminaries L2 v L15
Level Band System - Fair to all players within 'band' and eliminates the pointless L2 vs L15 scenario.
Last edited by July Fourth; 03-10-2013 at 04:56 PM.
*Retired From Top Eleven*