Tokened academy players

[PricopGeorgeCătălin]

It's clearly that something have to change there because I think over 90% of the U21 are not used by the originals owners of the players.

0T player = market next second or trained for neg.
4stars players = in most of the cases remain without a contract

In my opinion these players should cost only money and not tokens.

[talisman]

It's clearly that something have to change there because I think over 90% of the U21 are not used by the originals owners of the players.

0T player = market next second or trained for neg.
4stars players = in most of the cases remain without a contract

In my opinion these players should cost only money and not tokens.

IMO the higher-* player shouldn't cost us anything - we've already paid to install and develop the Youth system at our clubs, why should Nordeus get paid every time the Youth scheme produces players for the First team?

[PricopGeorgeCătălin]

IMO the higher-* player shouldn't cost us anything - we've already paid to install and develop the Youth system at our clubs, why should Nordeus get paid every time the Youth scheme produces players for the First team?

I agree with you regarding this. The only thing manager should pay is their wage and nothing else.

[Arion]

IMO the higher-* player shouldn't cost us anything - we've already paid to install and develop the Youth system at our clubs, why should Nordeus get paid every time the Youth scheme produces players for the First team?

We don't have a B squad first of all

Second, I've no object to the tokened players — it's frustrating to pay £££ after paying £££ to upgrade facilities. But isn't 26T a way too much? The range should be:
2*-0T
3*(0-2/5-7)-3T
3*(3-4/8-9)-4T
4*(0-1/5-6)-7T
4*(2-3/7-8)-8T
4*(4/9)-9T
5*(0-1/5-6)-15T