What kind of ridiculous opponents we face in Associations?

[USARABAT]

Nordeus gain a huge some of money from obsessed people who are ready to buy fame

[Javert89]

I see that association "LEGENDS NEVER DIE" disappeared from top of the list

Now it's Parrucchiere that is first, with some members well below 1% (one of them is ZERO stars) that builds a good 5*-6* during the tournament

[madflo19]

I have a team like this in my league, CL and cup, the same one. It started great and got full in a matter of days.
Yesterday I was almost able to get a draw against him, but still it's kind of BS. It's ok and legit to spend, but IMHO the gap between the min and max quality should be shorter. Having 9 stars is stupid and illogical too (why 9 and not even 10?).
Make it 5* maximum for legend players and 4 for scouts, while at the same time taking it longer to level up. If you get 5* team you are equivalent to Barca, while if you have 4*,4 1/2* you are equivalent to Chelsea or PSG.
If the difference is like what we have now, it's like Skenderbeu 6* and Barcellona 9* playing in the same CL group or League
WTF?

Attachment 86792

This guy is one of the admins of an fb group (te worldwide) he is a big spender-asso trickster lol
Also he is calling himself the one who find how to power train with gk drills and he was claiming that he can power train from 160% to 180% with up to 115 green packs..big LOL

[USARABAT]

they do this regularly to decrease their power before the draw takes place on thursday night - friday
the strong teams are out - they join before the games start or at the end of the month to collect tokens

[Bunzo]

The you have the Vietnamese
They are always up the front when scams and tricks are involved

[Guilherme1337]

I see that association "LEGENDS NEVER DIE" disappeared from top of the list

Now it's Parrucchiere that is first, with some members well below 1% (one of them is ZERO stars) that builds a good 5*-6* during the tournament

That asso didnt disappear, it became 'Living Legends'. The old leader prob sold their asso to that guys idk

Enviado do meu SM-J510FN através de Tapatalk

[achiie]

It's obvious for so long...if you have enough time in your hands, you can easily trick FA.

[pcmacdaniel]

This guy is one of the admins of an fb group (te worldwide) he is a big spender-asso trickster lol
Also he is calling himself the one who find how to power train with gk drills and he was claiming that he can power train from 160% to 180% with up to 115 green packs..big LOL

I'd like to see how he does against a fellow 160%+ team that knows how to properly train his team.

[Matteo de Clemente]

Hi, as we know, when Nordeus draws association tournments, quality rates between opponent associations ( and between opponent members,also ) may often not match.

So we may have a 120% memeber facing a 160% or above opponent member.

This is also due to a quality average rate elaboration by Nordeus that I say to be quite illogical,as it's not always related to a valid formation to be entered for your matches.

For example,if you try to enter a 140% formation with 11 gks ,or a 140% team without strikers or defenders ,it would be a sure mess for your match.
But Nordeus considers that 140% to be eligible for you to be drawn with such monsters ,you'll actually have to face using let's say a 120% quality....



Moreover I'm really disappointed at seeing level 3 and 4 teams with such those rates: what are they learning in their earliest seasons in top11!?

When I began playing top11, I completed from level 1 to level 4 with same initial team,plus auctions and players coming from school,and I learned
a strategy to be competitive. I did not know anything about Powertraining,token buying,etc

Now they learn at once to be token buyers (if they're not cheaters) and to massively use power training,instead of how to set a good strategy season by season.....

This is the why this game has become more and more uninteresting to many managers.

If Pt is the only strategy a manager knows to win,soon or later he won't win anymore even if spending,when in a competition where everybody spends

No further chance will be left to him,but keeping on wasting money or giving up....




(

Salve, come è noto, quando Nordeus effettua gli abbinamenti nel torneo delle associazioni, le percentuali di qualità tra associazioni (ed anche membri) rivali, può spesso essere molto diversa

Così è possibile che un membro di qualità 120% vada ad affrontarne uno di qualità 160% o superiore.

Ciò è dovuto anche ad un calcolo,da parte di Nordeus, della percentuale di qualità,che sostengo essere totalmente fuori da ogni logica,
in quanto non sempre legato ad una formazione reale da poter schierare nelle competizioni.


Ad esempio,provando a schierare una formazione di qualità 140% composta da 11 portieri ,o senza attaccanti o difensori ,la partita produrrebbe effetti disastrosi.
Eppure, Nordeus considera quel 140%,come motivo valido per poter essere sorteggiati contro questi mostri che,poi, andranno nella realtà affrontati ,per esempio,con una qualità 120%...


Inoltre sono parecchio deluso nel vedere squadre appartenenti ai livelli 3 o 4 con questi livelli qualitativi: cosa imparano questi nelle prime stagioni di top11!?

Quando ho iniziato io a giocare a top11, completai i primi 4 livelli con la stessa formazione che avevo dall'inizio,integrata con giocatori provenienti da aste e settore giovanile.
Ho imparato così a costruire una strategia x esssere competitivo.Non sapevo niente di Pt,acquisto di token,etc.

Ora imparano subito a comprare token (se non usano strumenti illegali),applicando un massivo PT,invece di come costruire a buona strategia ,stagione dopo stagione....

Questo è il motivo per cui il gioco è divenuto sempre meno interessante per molti allenatori.

Se l'unica strategia che conosci per vincere è il PT,prima o poi smetterai di vincere pur spendendo,quando tutti spendono.

Non avrai altre possibilità,a parte continuare a buttare via soldi o smettere ....




)

[nash123]

Oh and by the way Nordeus, 100% is an implicit maximum, why go over? Make the actual maximum level quality 100% and not 200%, because **** logic.
That way it would be more logical to have percentage as a quality standard.

The problem is... 100% in this case isn't implicit maximum. 100% only show, what's the quality compared to the level.

But I'm with you... that's not logical, because: do the % matter or the pts? If pts matter, why it's possible that a 200pts team beats an 190pts team easily 11:0... the quality difference isn't that height, like 20pts vs 10pts, but both differences are 40%...
If % matter... a result like this didn't have happened: click
It's the same never ending discussion, why a ST isn't a ST? You buy two "similar" ST, one performs, one doesn't... why?
Do key attributes really matter? If yes, why you win only ~3:0 vs 60% weaker team, which has 1:1 gray and key attributes, where you have a lot of 1% gray skillers (= high key attributes)?

Even if you are able to solve the puzzle... every update changes things. Or can you explain, why my team started very good to this season (~8:0 wins) and after that current update, we have lucky results (~1:0) against 60%, inactive teams? Why Costa had a ~4:6 FK-ratio, now every GK saves his FKs? Even the worst 3* keeper?

I really can't say, after the retirement of Costa, I will keep playing. I'm so annoyed and tired by this company (f.e. we all/a lot of manager want club history back... but we are still ignored - they don't care about the player, only caring about money. The question will be: how long does this work?)