What kind of ridiculous opponents we face in Associations?

[reddeviljohn]

First of all, he doesn't have players with the same quality as level 22:



You see it with 9 stars because you're checking his team from Associations, and in Associations only stars matters, not real quality. He has 9 star players, so in Associations you see them with 9 star players, not his real quality (which is "50" as you can see) even if he is 15-20 levels below you.

It's very easy to get 9 star players if you use the personal trainer. Of course it's going to cost you some tokens, but if you buy the best scout in the list (or the best recommended player offered to you) he will be already almost 7 stars. Going from 7 to 9 will cost you tokens but not as much as you imagine.

As I was saying, anyone has any proof for his accusations against this guy or can you accept you are dealing with a Manager who buys tokens?

Words fail me but u know what I am done with you

[Aldin Čolić]

Associations are the worst. I'm a level 52 and I mostly played with members of level 5 to 33.
Every game is some kind of pain for eyes. My players are at level of skills of 270 to 282, and can't beat a players of 70. It's not good.
What's about of experience?
Where is that?
It's not normal that a weaker manager be a better of team a level like mine.
It's look like better to start from a level 1 and played against a stronger managers.

[madflo19]

Associations are the worst. I'm a level 52 and I mostly played with members of level 5 to 33.
Every game is some kind of pain for eyes. My players are at level of skills of 270 to 282, and can't beat a players of 70. It's not good.
What's about of experience?
Where is that?
It's not normal that a weaker manager be a better of team a level like mine.
It's look like better to start from a level 1 and played against a stronger managers.

All managers are equal no matter their level, a 5 stars players for level 5 is same as a 5 stars players for level 50, their quality is counted by how many stars they have and not by their quality per level because in this way you are free to group with any manager no matter of what is his level.

Sent from my LG-D855 using Tapatalk

[a1i]

Associations are the worst. I'm a level 52 and I mostly played with members of level 5 to 33.
Every game is some kind of pain for eyes. My players are at level of skills of 270 to 282, and can't beat a players of 70. It's not good.
What's about of experience?
Where is that?
It's not normal that a weaker manager be a better of team a level like mine.
It's look like better to start from a level 1 and played against a stronger managers.

Oh my god! You see what I'm referring to? This guy has been playing for more than 4 years!!!!!!!!!! And still, he has no clue how things work. Come on man, just read the rules. This is utterly embarrassing to even ask. Ok let me answer, association is NOT about levels, it's about stars. Dont look at their rating outside of associations. Look at their rating inside... The PERCENTAGE% ... that should give you a semblance of how to compare players from different "so called experience" levels.

Geez.... unbelievable!