Recommended players - how the engine works

[Crisismana]

Spoke too soon - he found some - but he should know that I rarely use DML...

Attachment 78154

for a people that will buy 79 token player your excuse is "non sense!" rarely use DML ? really ? this is ridiculous.
give him 60 rest pack from ads he can be other than DML example he can be train to DC which is everyone use it. or DMC even a ML depend what you need him.
( this recomended still young and can keep his star for several season ahead)

the only people that has right to complain is the guy who get GK who can't be feed rest pack to get another position.

[nikolgiorgos]

no, why ?
79T is something a manager can gather in one season without buying or farming.
it's 50 T from associations if playing in GOLD 1 plus some tokens from daily gifts for example (without spending from the monthly 35T)
But for those tokens you expect something perfect.
This player has only 1 position useful for Tali, plus a sa not so useful for a defender.
If he was a DL-DC with "aerial" or "wall", then it would be a good case to think about.

[talisman]

I probably use a DML 2 or 3 times a season, and I have a perfectly good ML/DML player who can play in that position effectively, so I don't see the need to shell out 79T on another player in that position. Niko has it down right. The player is too expensive for my needs and has a pointless SA.

If he was a DC/DL with wall or aerial def. then I would have mortgaged my Grandmother to get the tokens for him, can't find that sort of player on the TM this season and the Scout ones all have penalty or corner SA.

The only thing Niko has wrong is that I can grab over 50T in a season - I'm not even in an Association, let alone one in Gold 1...

[Crisismana]

interesting... pointless SA huh... you are using 4-5-1V i am right ?

"4-5-1V needs excellent DMC and AML/AMR players to work correctly. It's my default formation, and the only arrows I use are 'up' on the two AM players."

[talisman]

interesting... pointless SA huh... you are using 4-5-1V i am right ?

"4-5-1V needs excellent DMC and AML/AMR players to work correctly. It's my default formation, and the only arrows I use are 'up' on the two AM players."

Your point? 4-5-1V doesn't use DML. It doesn't use ML either, hence I have a reasonable-Q utility ML/DML for the occasions when I do need one of those positions.

[Crisismana]

my point is why you so riggid to set him to only play DML when you can train him to be DMC instead (as 19 yo. he is fast trainer)

figure it your self here : set him as CK and see this SA PM do his magic. (remember he has background of DL/DML who has good crossing)

and what 4-5-1V needs to works correctly ? "yeah. DML with pointless SA."

you said "If he was a DC/DL with wall or aerial def. then I would have mortgaged my Grandmother to get"

then what do you do for a "Legendary Playmaker" ?

good manager not expect something to be perfect for him. they create it for them self.

https://forum.topeleven.com/top-elev...reenshots.html

[talisman]

You're assuming that (a) I've got the green packs, and/or the T to buy them after shelling out the 79 for the player, and (b) the time to spend training him to be the player that I want/need.

If I did buy the player, I would spend 90% of the time playing him as DL - for that I'd need him to have wall or aerial def., as my current DC/DL and DC/DMC players do.

You're being totally illogical - I'm not spending 79T on a player who is 2/3rds useless to me. I'll save the T for a player to come up that does fit in with my team. At the moment, a DL/DML does not.

I can see no point in continuing this conversation. Have a nice day.

[nikolgiorgos]

my point is why you so riggid to set him to only play DML when you can train him to be DMC instead

Ι don't think this is a good idea (from the managerial point of view).
Here is a player you can buy with not so many tokens, with double position and (maybe) useful sa.
then you can invest to him for an extra position or quality (as he is 5* player and he can do some good gaining)


Also to him



but for 70T you can expect only a player of high q, ready for your team

[Ryan Gosling]

Hoping to not get a GK anymore by my assistant... i sell my old one and bought 2 young... now i've got 3 GK...
It's useless.. it's always the same who plays...
If i got a GK next time.. i think i'll be mad for sure!

[LeManiaque]

I've got 3x GK on the bench, 2-3 ST (can't remember those who will never play), and 1 DR @85 + 1 DR/ DMR @64.

Wonder if the boost to 25 on the roster will make for more diverse recommendations