Goalkeeper develop

[LeManiaque]

Here are my 2, frequent 8 ratings every season, but both have inconsistency. Van Ginkel flopped and probably cost me 2 finals matches 2 seasons. at the same time, both have made all the saves in some vital matches. Different skills (more alike now than historically), height (Van G=200, Atar=183) SA. Both play about 50:50. Both take 1-2 MoM per season. Both are open to counterattack, both can stop set plays. Atar has the "But Atar's aerial reach dominates" comment surprisingly often given his height and low skill. Both mess up when moving the ball out, but Atar has been the start of some goal-creating plays. Good, not perfect, like the GK they replaced. They've rated about the same since i picked them up, though for a while I thought they'd only rate 8 every time. Often when one plays poorly, the other struggles similarly when subbed (some of GK performance can be defenders, and tactics of the match)

I thought I'd really notice something, since they are really different, but both good... I think some players are really good, really often, most are mediocre, and some are usually solid, but have "bad days". Like a bell curve of Nordgen players.