Interesting players;)

[LarryC]

Sure, this gives the advantage of having strong players in their main attributes,but global quality does not grow up so outrangeously,so
to also contain quality average of the whole team

some managers speculate that this can be an advantage.

To me only one of these two statements is true, but I don't know which one:
- global quality (q% or number of stars) matters, then when grey skills go low you need to keep white skills up in order to keep a good average (one can say you could also inefficiently train the grey skills).
- grey skills don't matter, and the global quality value/star is not representative of the actual quality of the player. In this case we are all victims of an illusion when we use stars/q% to evaluate players