Key attributes, my theory

[KenoticFC]

There are many things to analyze .

Perhaps you have not yet passed a course on it

If you are really a successful manager I'm very glad for you. But you have to realize that you sound very arrogant when you talk like this man. Do we need a PhD to play this game, come on lol.

[LacBuoc]

@Nash123 : i can clip match , i don't picture meaningless . Those parameters do not say anything , You do not care about it just take time



picture of you , They simply play defensive counterattack , You play attack

They succeed , You stalemate has no solution . This game is normal with no troll

[nash123]

@Nash123 : i can clip match , i don't picture meaningless . Those parameters do not say anything , You do not care about it just take time



picture of you , They simply play defensive counterattack , You play attack

They succeed , You stalemate has no solution . This game is normal with no troll

Sry, but that's not true. I started normal, after 2:0 (SoT: 2:3 for me), I changed to defensive - nothing changed until 50', so I used hard defending. My team scored 2:1 (SoT: 4:4), I changed nothing more, final stats at screen. So, why I lost that game?

I avoid to play attacking, and if attacking is your reason, why my team had (and still has) a lot of shots, but only few SoT, you don't know more...

I also made some tests over the last few months... I also made friendlies against the team of my wife (I play both, so I know exactly what my opponent did), and it didn't matter, if I played hard defending, defending, normal, attacking, hard attacking. My shot to SoT ratio was nearly the same (+-1-2).
But the problem is: friendlies are useless: a friend made 4 season ago a lot of friendlies against me (some, both had full moral, condition,... and I was supporting my team) - I won not a single friendly... but at CL, I won 7:1 and 3:0, while we used at first game the same formations/tactics, we used at friendlies. Explaination?