Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 71
Like Tree27Likes

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: [Official] Changes to Displayed Quality

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Dreamer Rizla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    415
    Ι am not talking the affect on me, but on the result calculation.
    Why low quality subs should penalised?

  2. #2
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    246
    to make it more real.have you not seen teams with 11 players with 7* having all subs on 1* ?
    jarharnamme likes this.

  3. #3
    Dreamer Rizla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    415
    Ofcourse but this is no reason to be punished...they should calculate the first 11 players...simple.
    michaelefc likes this.

  4. #4
    Apprentice
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    246
    well.
    now game shows average quality of your top 14, regardless of where they are atm. try it, put your top players as reserves, still the same. less chance to manipulate I guess.

    all that said, yeah, there should be option to see starting 11 as well

  5. #5
    Pro jarharnamme's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    not found
    Posts
    869

    if this was done to prevent manager who exploit the system by selling players at the end of season just so they can group with weak league and win treble every season.
    then i'm happy and fully agree with this update

  6. #6
    Dreamer Rizla's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    415
    This is not the way to prevent managers exploit the system.
    They could sell players to the end of the season eitherway.
    The question remains:
    Does this affect the calculation of the result?

  7. #7
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Posts
    82
    Hello, yesterday my players had a strengh of 120 % after this Update they will be shown as 117 % . Where are the 3 % are gone ???
    Another Bug fans who are connected over Facebook and are not my friends will be shown as anonymus fans
    Last edited by Never; 02-14-2018 at 11:38 AM. Reason: wrong size

  8. #8
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    77
    Quote Originally Posted by Rizla View Post
    This is not the way to prevent managers exploit the system.
    They could sell players to the end of the season eitherway.
    The question remains:
    Does this affect the calculation of the result?
    Still the main question. The value now shows the average of the 14 best players, but the result will be affected by this average, or just by the average of the 11 players who plays?

  9. #9
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    13
    The top 14 players quality will confuse players, for example if you have a quality of 160% for 11 players, the reserves are 1%, that means 116% quality for the team.
    BUT the first 11 still has 160% quality, so it doesn't matter the 3 subs. And if this way the quality is reduced we, the rest of the players have more chance to play against those tanking players that have 160% like in my example above (this in association matches). More chance to lose for weaker teams.

  10. #10
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    13
    Hello,

    So how will this update affect a match that is played 11vs11 players? If my top 11 is 118% and top 14 is 114%, my opponent's top 11 is 120% and top 14 is 122%.
    How will this affect my game? My team's quality is reduced, but the figures are not real, I can still not use any of my reserves in a match. I don't see the logic, after the above mentioned example my opponent will see me weaker then I am in fact.
    I will not train my reserves as well as my first team, the reason is that, if they play less matches they will not develop like a regular match player and they will age the same and will lose 20% every season. And also if I play friendly matches every day with them they are not growing as well.
    Last edited by mlinu031087; 02-14-2018 at 11:40 AM.

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast