first impressions and a little excuses

[po_zdrach]

So, I want to share with players and developers my first impressions about International Cup.

But first of all I have to apologize about my reactions after I saw it. In first I thinked that this will be competition and thought that I have paid with my resources (tokens and green) only for opportunity to meet stronger opponents made my angry. In fact, my disappointment was boundless. I said some words about developers (liars, cheaters, bastards) and I thought even more brute who could not share with them because of censorship. My apologize about this, but I realy went wrong that this is competition. Now I uderstand that this is very nice timer.



My first impressions are very good. Now, how I wrote in another topic, there are place for some improvements (for example include days, months and why not years) but I think that will happen in time and in futures updates. Nordeus says that they "collect the feedback from everyone across" and I have not reason to not believe. For now it is very nice and work very well for me. I used it for timer for boil of eggs and I had very good results.

In my opiniot International Cup is valuble for resources it cost me and I am realy happy with my new timer.

Cheers guys

[rogerniceguy]

Im guessing this is meant to be a joke lol. Be careful as they will really think it's great and make no changes

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[po_zdrach]

May be they will add barometer?

[Javert89]

Be careful they may have some algorithm to detect sarkasmus.. As they have one to little offset positions of players in BOT teams

[nikolgiorgos]

ok, now that your mind and thoughts are more clear and cool,

What kind of draw would you expect ?

Ok, it would be better having all human managers but maybe bot teams are necessary to overcome some problems like having many countries like Brazil, Germany or England.
Also it's easier to set convenient hours of the games.

What else ?
What quality of teams ?
All about the same q (but be warned for this ?)
Four scales of quality ? 75%, 95%, 105%, 115% up ?
A manager with 75% obviously didn't invest to that project and playing for fun
but what chances and interest would have a manager with 95% or 105% q vs 8 managers of 120% ?

* this question is not only for @po_zdrach but for every one.

[po_zdrach]

With this draw, every effort in prepare phase is meaningless. I have better chances with my abandoned team.

Do not try to defend Nordeus Nik, I know, you know, everyone know how unfair is this draw.

What about timer? What you say about the most expensive timer I ever have?

[nikolgiorgos]

With this draw, every effort in prepare phase is meaningless. I have better chances with my abandoned team.
Do not try to defend Nordeus Nik, I know, you know, everyone know how unfair is this draw.
What about timer? What you say about the most expensive timer I ever have?

I 'm not defending anyone.
(fyi, we the mods don't have any extra info about the game but have also the free will of criticizing).
After the IC start, I also followed the advice to prepare better my team (I spent 120 tokens for buying extra players and about 120 greens for extra games, ending with a victory on Spain).
When I saw my group, with another human manager same q and two bot teams little less, I pissed of and decided that I won't follow any more my team and leave all my games in auto.



But let's say that nord-devs are watching the forum as we represent a part of what they call "communities" ..
so
What kind of draw would you expect ?
I would be ok if every group had a top dog with a quality like my team,
a 2nd human manager with some less q, like 90-98% and the two bot teams with qualities of 75% and 85% .

Every group having the same architecture so the top dogs if playing good, to cross with the underdogs and continue like this.

Every manager who made a team above 100% (creating this quality, it means you already spent much more tokens and greens that the prizes of the IC) , should be the top dog of his group (so it should be 104% - 90% and 80% -70% the two bots)

[rogerniceguy]

Please no bot teams. Games usp is human 2 human real active managers

I 'm not defending anyone.
(fyi, we the mods don't have any extra info about the game but have also the free will of criticizing).
After the draw, as I also followed the advice to prepare better my team (I spent 120 tokens for buying extra players and about 120 greens for extra games, ending with a victory on Spain).
When I saw my group, with another human manager same q and two bot teams little less, I pissed of and decided that I won't follow any more my team and leave all my games in auto.



But let's say that nord-devs are watching the forum as we represent a part of what they call "communities" ..
so
What kind of draw would you expect ?
I would be ok if every group had a top dog with a quality like my team,
a 2nd human manager with some less q, like 90-98% and the two bot teams with qualities of 75% and 85% .

Every group having the same architecture so the top dogs if playing good, to cross with the underdogs and continue like this.

Every manager who made a team above 100% (creating this quality, it means you already spent much more tokens and greens that the prizes of the IC) , should be the top dog of his group (so it should be 104% - 90% and 80% -70% the two bots)

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[rogerniceguy]

Four scales of quality to reflect effort resources and money spent.

Next to no bots. Abandon idea of 1 Germany 1 England 1 Spain. Use Te team names with national emblem and kits and maybe nation underneath somehow.

Have all 6 asso members in same competition for banter

ok, now that your mind and thoughts are more clear and cool,

What kind of draw would you expect ?

Ok, it would be better having all human managers but maybe bot teams are necessary to overcome some problems like having many countries like Brazil, Germany or England.
Also it's easier to set convenient hours of the games.

What else ?
What quality of teams ?
All about the same q (but be warned for this ?)
Four scales of quality ? 75%, 95%, 105%, 115% up ?
A manager with 75% obviously didn't invest to that project and playing for fun
but what chances and interest would have a manager with 95% or 105% q vs 8 managers of 120% ?

* this question is not only for @po_zdrach but for every one.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[nikolgiorgos]

Four scales of quality to reflect effort resources and money spent.

Next to no bots. Abandon idea of 1 Germany 1 England 1 Spain. Use Te team names with national emblem and kits and maybe nation underneath somehow.

I wrote

Ok, it would be better having all human managers but maybe bot teams are necessary to overcome some problems like having many countries like Brazil, Germany or England.
Also it's easier to set convenient hours of the games.

We know that China, Indonesia and Vietnam have some million accounts who could complete many groups.
so @rogerniceguy, would you prefer to play vs a Chinese at morning time (as it the only convenient time for Far East and European players) or vs a bot in a good time at evening ?