This need to be clarified from Nordeus ( AML AMR strange position on the field )

[IImaestroII]

Is it make sense? i play with 4-1-2-2-1 or 4-1-2-3 but in that manager section says that i play 4-4-2 attacking style although i had never played 4-4-2

lol

[Aku Papua]

Double... Edit

[Aku Papua]

There is another thread about how (wrong) the wingers are moving.
Was it yours @ IImaestroII ?



That's a big truth. Are all those just illusions ?
In one game I was playing and my ST scored from the box.
At the same time, watching that game from my other team, I saw that player scoring from a F-K.
lol

Ohhh so thats how it happens?? I tot we wud seeing the exact same game play...

[LOS ABRANTES FC]

The only thing I now is if your amr/l plays in the middle (it's better say all over the field) it burns out a lot of his condition, more than usual. So I prefer to avoid it, or use it just for a little bit.

[IImaestroII]

The only thing I now is if your amr/l plays in the middle (it's better say all over the field) it burns out a lot of his condition, more than usual. So I prefer to avoid it, or use it just for a little bit.

Interesting, i will some tests about this

[nikolgiorgos]

The only thing I now is if your amr/l plays in the middle (it's better say all over the field) it burns out a lot of his condition, more than usual. So I prefer to avoid it, or use it just for a little bit.

hmm, not exactly.
Burning condition has to do with performance.
A player who performed good and got a good rate, spent little more condition.
Let's say you have an AML and AMR in exactly the same place of the box/field.
Both started with 99% condition.
AML played superb, got a 9 and spent 24% condition (no high pressing or mtm).
AMR had a bad day, got a 7 but spent only 18% condition.

That was happening from the old TE times, before live animations.

[LOS ABRANTES FC]

hmm, not exactly.
Burning condition has to do with performance.
A player who performed good and got a good rate, spent little more condition.
Let's say you have an AML and AMR in exactly the same place of the box/field.
Both started with 99% condition.
AML played superb, got a 9 and spent 24% condition (no high pressing or mtm).
AMR had a bad day, got a 7 but spent only 18% condition.

That was happening from the old TE times, before live animations.

That's ok, but by what I experienced, playing well an AML/R lied playing at the middle (or lined up at the bottom side of the box) burnt out more condition, the same as if he played extra time (more than 30%). I'll see to carry some evidence..

[nikolgiorgos]

more than 30%

no, that's impossible.

Condition loss in a simple game is between 18-23%.

[khris]

That's ok, but by what I experienced, playing well an AML/R lied playing at the middle (or lined up at the bottom side of the box) burnt out more condition, the same as if he played extra time (more than 30%). I'll see to carry some evidence..

This could only occur with some extra booster settings (in attack, High pressure + some training bonuses like attack/possession ones and only when the "random selector that applies these boosters, chose this specific player to apply the bonuses on him") still a 30% diff' for a single player is something I never seen even playing with multiple out position players and so...

[Gabez Teh]

KUDOS for Hidegkuti!