Top 10 Associations - Week 40

[nikolgiorgos]

treble is no longer an achievement - it’s too easy to get ....

c'mon guys, let's be serious
Top hundred it's the vitrine of TE.
Being there, gives a publicity to provide your country, your ideas or to earn more token and sell the group for real money.
TE still has challenges.

Do you believe that anyone can win the treble
Without downgrading the team's q ?
Without upgrading the team after few tanking seasons ?
Without spending money ?
Without using extra tokens or greens from the stock ?
Without playing a bunch of friendlies daily ?
Without using mutants , only simple 100% players ?

Personally I don't remember any case, specially for 2 or more seasons in a row .
Maybe some cases in the first levels where there are many amateur managers.

[nikolgiorgos]

treble is no longer an achievement - it’s too easy to get ....

c'mon guys, let's be serious
Top hundred it's the vitrine of TE.
Being there, gives a publicity to provide your country, your ideas or to earn more token and sell the group for real money.
TE still has challenges.

Do you believe that anyone can win the treble
Without downgrading the team's q ?
Without upgrading the team after few tanking seasons ?
Without spending money ?
Without using extra tokens or greens from the stock ?
Without playing a bunch of friendlies daily ?
Without using mutants , only simple 100% players ?

Personally I don't remember any case, specially for 2 or more seasons in a row .
Maybe some cases in the first levels where there are many amateur managers.

btw, if anyone want's to take that challenge (with the conditions above), I offer a tempting bet

[stra]

how about a random pairing not based on quality cause that is what happens in real life since the programmers are so obsessed with making the game realistic

[PricopGeorgeCătălin]

how about a random pairing not based on quality cause that is what happens in real life since the programmers are so obsessed with making the game realistic

Honestly would be by far the most fairly system. Just like CL in the K.O stage, is pure random and that's the whole fun in it!

[nikolgiorgos]

random pairing is not fair.
In a cup or a CH.L. of 32 or 64 teams, there will be 3-4 very strong so it will be hopeless for the rest.

[stra]

random pairing is not fair.
In a cup or a CH.L. of 32 or 64 teams, there will be 3-4 very strong so it will be hopeless for the rest.

how do you mean not fair if both teams are at the same level or same Association level

currently CH. L. and cup are aleardy skewed to a few strong teams

do you think its fair to managers who put in the necessary effort to sit by and watch teams with low AVQs paired against each other and be in top 10 associations?

PS. regarding tankers it will be best if Nordeus does a -30% at end of season if you did not qualify for promotion.

[lalexrus]

PS. regarding tankers it will be best if Nordeus does a -30% at end of season if you did not qualify for promotion.

don't do that. I explain - you create a team at the first level, at the second level you leave it to tanking. in 10 seasons this will be a team of about -250 -270 rated (but you see 1 in game). get her into an association. For example, there are 5 teams with a rating of 200 and one with a rating of -250. the average rating will be 124. This association will always score at least 110 points. and you will always lose. and it's simple math why you can't do that. (For example see top49 asso - current version)

It seems to me that the only option to defeat tanking and such frauds is to impose a minimum skill limit restriction, for example at 20 (like max 340) and then you can already talk about withdrawing at least 20%-40% from players.

Отправлено с моего MI MAX через Tapatalk

[po_zdrach]

random pairing is not fair.
In a cup or a CH.L. of 32 or 64 teams, there will be 3-4 very strong so it will be hopeless for the rest.

This is the way that football works in real live. And it is fairer than current draw system

[stra]

This is the way that football works in real live. And it is fairer than current draw system

exactly

[po_zdrach]

don't do that. I explain - you create a team at the first level, at the second level you leave it to tanking. in 10 seasons this will be a team of about -250 -270 rated (but you see 1 in game). get her into an association. For example, there are 5 teams with a rating of 200 and one with a rating of -250. the average rating will be 124. This association will always score at least 110 points. and you will always lose. and it's simple math why you can't do that. (For example see top49 asso - current version)

It seems to me that the only option to defeat tanking and such frauds is to impose a minimum skill limit restriction, for example at 20 (like max 340) and then you can already talk about withdrawing at least 20%-40% from players.

Отправлено с моего MI MAX через Tapatalk

Against tanking there is simple decision - make tokens reward for first 4 places in leagues. Decrease token rewards for association tournament and voala!!

Just make league competition important as association tournament.