As there is a new contest with asso groups, I post here what I was thinking before long time.
Ok, so the captain decides for everything, he has total control of the groups, can kick out any member or even the vice-captain.
The vice-captain can do some actions but only if the captain agree - or else can change to default and kick out the v-captain.
Is it fair ?
Doesn't look so.
How about to add a new rule ?
The captain cannot kick out (or demote) the v-captain, only the simple members.
If one weekend the v-captain won't saw in any of the four games of the group, he looses his title and becomes a simple member automatically .
Then the captain can kick him out or make him again vice captain (if they are aware of his absence) .
Any other ideas against the dictatorship of the captain ?


 20Likes
20Likes LinkBack URL
 LinkBack URL About LinkBacks
 About LinkBacks

 
			
			 
					
					
					
						 Reply With Quote
  Reply With Quote 
						 
						 Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
 Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos
					
 , it really depends on what kind of person he is. A good Leader don't kick without sense or take decision always on his own.
, it really depends on what kind of person he is. A good Leader don't kick without sense or take decision always on his own.


