WTH? Am I missing something?

[PeterMeter]

I played a traditional 4-4-2 in the CL-semi and tried the 4-5-1 V formation and it almost cost me the game. I usually don't mix up a lot in the tactics, preferring to only adapt the formation but I change it around if there's an opponent who uses the sides more or are very heavy in the middle. I reverted to a 4-4-2 narrow diamond in the 2nd half and only just won the game 2-1 inspite of having a 3-4*s better team.

An attacking AMC is probably a good idea to make use of the space between his D and M and if you top it up with 3 in the middle and maybe focus passing down the middle that might do the trick. The 3-1-4-2 has been mildly effective as well.

[cracicot]

c`mon stop bull**** with tactics when i win 3-4-1-2 every 4-4-2 but only the one who donated this season more then me beat me (or i just dream) !

Last season i spend like 300 tokens and i made a team competitive for 2 season , this season i donated only for ~150 tokens because already had the team 5~7* high quality for all others even so ... two teams beat me with **** 4-4-2 in ch league and league even if i over pass them with 5 quality and on field even more ... explain this **** in tactic ?

Don`t post about tactics because in the end is all bull**** ! Special thanks for developer teams for their great job on this game improve !

Simon, talk about a bull in a china shop.....

Ro, stop spending if you feel that you are not getting your money's worth.

Until I see that tactics dont work, I will continue to play as if they do.

I still fully believe that nothing you do in-game matters, but you have to make sure you have all your ducks in a row before the game starts as that is when the NGE determines who wins. Until Nordeus comes out and denies that, I reserve the right to believe it.

[cracicot]

oh and by the way ... how that my scout MC make a fault in area and his **** MC with more defense then attack it scores 2 times ?
how that 4* defenders stop my ST 7*& 6* and my 5* defenders(with SA) are not able to block **** ST 4* ?

the list can continue but why to speak when no mod / administrator explain this ...
better i do like my friend after spending money in game he quit because of this bull****s and now his abandon team wins the league with out taking care of it ... in one word ? ****

all I can say is WOW! for your friend. Winning the league without playing is a slap in the face to everyone.

Ro, what is NOT cool is to come in and hijack a thread with a vent. Start another thread and post it there please.

[cracicot]

I played a traditional 4-4-2 in the CL-semi and tried the 4-5-1 V formation and it almost cost me the game. I usually don't mix up a lot in the tactics, preferring to only adapt the formation but I change it around if there's an opponent who uses the sides more or are very heavy in the middle. I reverted to a 4-4-2 narrow diamond in the 2nd half and only just won the game 2-1 inspite of having a 3-4*s better team.

An attacking AMC is probably a good idea to make use of the space between his D and M and if you top it up with 3 in the middle and maybe focus passing down the middle that might do the trick. The 3-1-4-2 has been mildly effective as well.

I like what you say about the AMC. I have given much thought to this and I like this 3-4-1-2. It gives me the same amount in midfield + AMC. 3 DCs to his 2 ST. and I have 2 ST + AMC on his 2 DC if I put red arrow on AMC.

What instructions do you think? arrows on wingers and amc, attacking, up middle, normal tackle, zonal, no offsides, no counter, short passing?

[cracicot]

So what do you think guys? 34 mins to game time.

4-4-2 or 3-4-1-2?

tactics/instructions?

[hullabaloo]

sorry if this is too late. otherwise, go for 4-4-2!
just let your better players do the work

[cracicot]

sorry if this is too late. otherwise, go for 4-4-2!
just let your better players do the work

I almost did that but decided that I wanted a bit more firepower and not risk a 1-0 game or it going into penalties. 3-4-1-2 it was and 3-1 final for me.