Results 1 to 10 of 152
Like Tree88Likes

  Click here to go to the first staff post in this thread.   Thread: [Official] King of the Hill Challenge - FULL-TIME

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rookie
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Posts
    144
    Quote Originally Posted by SausyFC View Post
    It hasn't changed - if you win, their trophy count will decrease; my guess is that they've won another one in the interim.
    I don't think it is that simple. What I understand is that there is one trophy BETWEEN any TWO managers and only one of those managers can have that trophy at a time. So for any manager there are 9 trophies they could get but only losses to the managers they have won trophies from would decrease their total.

    Ex.
    So if manager A has beaten manager B then A shows 1 and B shows 0. If B then goes and beats A then B has one and A has 0.
    However, if manager A beats manager C then A has 1 (the one between A and C) so if B beats A, B will have 1 (the one between A and B) but A will still have 1 because that one belonged to C.

    In the end for a manager to have 9 he/she would have to beat all other managers and then any losses would reduce that number. But if a manager has 5 lets say, and one of the four they did not play beats them the manager would still have 5.

    Does this make sense? (I hope so)
    SausyFC likes this.

  2.   Click here to go to the next staff post in this thread.   #2
    Administrator SausyFC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    1,678
    Quote Originally Posted by julien12 View Post
    I don't think it is that simple. What I understand is that there is one trophy BETWEEN any TWO managers and only one of those managers can have that trophy at a time. So for any manager there are 9 trophies they could get but only losses to the managers they have won trophies from would decrease their total.

    Ex.
    So if manager A has beaten manager B then A shows 1 and B shows 0. If B then goes and beats A then B has one and A has 0.
    However, if manager A beats manager C then A has 1 (the one between A and C) so if B beats A, B will have 1 (the one between A and B) but A will still have 1 because that one belonged to C.

    In the end for a manager to have 9 he/she would have to beat all other managers and then any losses would reduce that number. But if a manager has 5 lets say, and one of the four they did not play beats them the manager would still have 5.

    Does this make sense? (I hope so)
    This is correct, yeah. My example only covers the head-to-head between the two managers competing for the trophy that exists between the two of them.