It seems like Quality, Attendance and Tactics mean Nothing in this Game

[Lucian1986]

With those qualities it's not a troll.

I didn't say they were trolls per se. Those are just bouts of luck. This is how the luck factor should play out, although for the match where there was a 15% quality difference, you have to also add all the bonuses the stronger team had. These bonuses would no doubt push it into the 20% range, which makes the result strange. Had both managers attended, I would have been more likely to agree that it was just a slip up.

I think Funker said it best in his response. When I watched the game, I felt that the simulator simply had the other team winning. The manager did everything right, put all the bonuses on his side and had a significant margin of superiority, but it seemed like the dice were already rolled. At that point, why bother spending time on your team?

In my opinion, a troll result is when you have (1) a team that is 25% weaker and they tie or defeat the stronger team or (2) two equal teams end up with a crazy score (i.e. 102 vs 105% and the 102% player wins by 7 goals).

I think that the game should be about managers having fun and getting excited about close encounters (10% difference), not worrying every game that it will be a troll match where the reason for their loss was because the simulator said so.