Can anyone explain this match for me?

[Shanghai Shenhua]

Newcastle
4-5-1V
Defensive or possibly hard defensive (with an attacking formation!)
Short passing?
Possibly hard tackling?
No or low win bonus OR poor morale or condition
Manager probably watched match.

2 of 6 wrong, that's accurate?(win bonus/moral/condition; defensive)
and 2 of 6 are so obviously.(4-5-1v ,watching match)
the result is only 2 of 6 are correct base on you guess.(short passing/hard tackling)

If you pulled your flankers back, then that's even worse - not only did you effectively take them out of the game, you freed up two of his defenders. If he had red arrows on his MCs as i expect, then he had a 3 on 3 situation against the middle of your defense, while you ended up with 1 on 3 against his. Looking again, i was probably wrong about the blue arrows on his wingers - more likely red arrows.
Others have pointed out several other aspects of how he countered you with better tactics.

so the ML AND MR in 442 or 4141 means being effectively taken out of the game and have nothing to do with other's DR DL?It does not make sense in real(Ribery and Robben played as ML and MR in game vs Barcelona) or in the game
Better tactics means same tactics?after I pulled my two flankers back, I am using same formation as he did,and same order you guessed for his tactics.
btw, all his tactics are based on you assumption.

I have a 4 star, 43 defender and a 5 star, 48 defender. Which is better?
Of course it's a trick question. The 4 star defender has defensive rating of 50.2, the 5 star defender has a defensive rating of 48.6 ( I also keep physical skills close to primary skill - some people don't. but no matter your opinion on the physical skills, there's little reason to put skill points into attacking skills for a defender.)

The above example is minor - a player can be 2quality levels above his star level in his primary skill. In other words, a 3 star player can be as good or better than a 5 star player. Got it? So stars mean nothing - they're a general gauge of overall quality, nothing more. And the higher your level as a manger, the less importance even that is. a 5 star 30 player is much better (33%) than a 3 star 20 player, but a 5 star 80 player is only a little bit better (12%) than a 3 star 70 player.

checked,all normal players with average distribution of skill points.

[Razz]

2 of 6 wrong, that's accurate?(win bonus/moral/condition; defensive)
and 2 of 6 are so obviously.(4-5-1v ,watching match)
the result is only 2 of 6 are correct base on you guess.(short passing/hard tackling)

You already admitted you used defensive mentality. It's not "obvious" who was watching the match, but can be inferred from the formation and possession. Given the limited information you posted, yeah, my analysis was pretty darned accurate.

so the ML AND MR in 442 or 4141 means being effectively taken out of the game and have nothing to do with other's DR DL?

In this case, yes. DL does not defend against MR in zonal defense (unless the MR has red arrows). By pulling back from AMR to MR, you free up that DL to focus on the left third of the middle (your red arrow MCs).

It does not make sense in real(Ribery and Robben played as ML and MR in game vs Barcelona) or in the game

SO WHAT? Real life is not a computer game, a computer game is not real life.

Better tactics means same tactics?after I pulled my two flankers back, I am using same formation as he did,and same order you guessed for his tactics.
btw, all his tactics are based on you assumption.

Except, again, you already stated you used defensive mentality.
At this point, it's obvious you have no interest in an explanation - you simply want to vent without being relegated to the vent thread. Goodbye.