2 of 6 wrong, that's accurate?(win bonus/moral/condition; defensive)Newcastle
4-5-1V
Defensive or possibly hard defensive (with an attacking formation!)
Short passing?
Possibly hard tackling?
No or low win bonus OR poor morale or condition
Manager probably watched match.
and 2 of 6 are so obviously.(4-5-1v ,watching match)
the result is only 2 of 6 are correct base on you guess.(short passing/hard tackling)
so the ML AND MR in 442 or 4141 means being effectively taken out of the game and have nothing to do with other's DR DL?It does not make sense in real(Ribery and Robben played as ML and MR in game vs Barcelona) or in the game
Better tactics means same tactics?after I pulled my two flankers back, I am using same formation as he did,and same order you guessed for his tactics.
btw, all his tactics are based on you assumption.
checked,all normal players with average distribution of skill points.I have a 4 star, 43 defender and a 5 star, 48 defender. Which is better?
Of course it's a trick question. The 4 star defender has defensive rating of 50.2, the 5 star defender has a defensive rating of 48.6 ( I also keep physical skills close to primary skill - some people don't. but no matter your opinion on the physical skills, there's little reason to put skill points into attacking skills for a defender.)
The above example is minor - a player can be 2quality levels above his star level in his primary skill. In other words, a 3 star player can be as good or better than a 5 star player. Got it? So stars mean nothing - they're a general gauge of overall quality, nothing more. And the higher your level as a manger, the less importance even that is. a 5 star 30 player is much better (33%) than a 3 star 20 player, but a 5 star 80 player is only a little bit better (12%) than a 3 star 70 player.