Results 1 to 10 of 89
Like Tree77Likes

Thread: Guide: Understanding the 2016 Training System

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Dreamer
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Uppsala, Sweden
    Posts
    466
    Ok, next session. This one was interesting to me. I only ran PTP drills (I only had rests for 9 practices):
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	11 Drills.jpg 
Views:	371 
Size:	29.5 KB 
ID:	71605

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8 Test 3 Resultat.png 
Views:	373 
Size:	47.6 KB 
ID:	71606

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9 Test 3 Varför.jpg 
Views:	370 
Size:	67.3 KB 
ID:	71607

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	10 Training efficiancy factor.png 
Views:	371 
Size:	8.1 KB 
ID:	71608

    Despite only running one drill, the Training-Efficiency Factor was exactly the same. It definitely seem like the mix of drills used does not impact the individual result, only the bonuses. Or what do you guys think?

    Very stable results, the deviation for positioning first caught my eye, but really its only one skill% which causes the entire deviation. It would even out with a bigger sample size. Edit: I just wanted to add that while the results looks extremely stable in this table, the %s in each practice session moved around in the session if you get what I mean. Like the first practice I got a +1 Marking from the first drill, the next session I got +1 Marking on like the 3rd drill, and so forth.
    Last edited by Al Svanberg; 09-23-2016 at 09:36 AM.
    Duncton, Rautz and LeManiaque like this.