Are the ML/MR positions wasted?

[rememberthegirl2009]

I never get a lot of production, i.e. goals, assists, MOMs, from my ML or MR positions. Are there certain formations or orders (down both flanks - which I've tried and still don't get a lot) that help get better production from the ML or MR position?

More and more I see formations with 2 MCs and no ML or MR. I think this is because the game has some bias against them.

What do you think?

AML & AMR positions are better than MR & ML. They can attack intensively to the opponents' goal. I've never been used ML & MR players for along time.

Sent from my SM-J710F using Tapatalk

[julien12]

AML & AMR positions are better than MR & ML. They can attack intensively to the opponents' goal. I've never been used ML & MR players for along time.

Sent from my SM-J710F using Tapatalk

I also have great success using AML / AMR combo. But I also havean ML that I would like to get on the same field as my AML. IS anyone out there getting production from their ML or MR )(with is : If so, how are you doing it?