My 4-4-2, which has helped me to a comfortable first place position, was just CRUSHED by a slightly lesser opponent by a score of 1-7. I was the away team playing against a slightly lesser opponent (86.8 v 86.4).
He played a 4-4-1-1. My settings were Defensive with Counter-attacks.
I wonder if the game settings have just been changed?
A major caveat here too, I was down 3-1 when I picked up a red card but still at the time I was getting killed in score and statistically (possession, shots, etc.). So maybe there isn't enough data here and it was just a fluke where the computer randomly gave him goals on his first few shots.
My comfortable 6 point lead is now down to 3 with 3 games to go.
You can also try a 4-4-2 classic
If he's supposed to attack on flank, just put blu arrows on ML/MR and red on MC.
This way you'll defend with a 4-2(DMx)-2-2 and attack with a 4-3-1-2
Mad Horses
Level 29 (Italian team, season 31)
League: 1st place: 16 - 2nd place: 6 - 3rd place: 2
Champions: 1st place: 8 - 2nd place: 5 - 3rd place: 2
Cup: 1st place: 3, 2nd place: 1 - 3rd place: 2
Mad Horses
Level 29 (Italian team, season 31)
League: 1st place: 16 - 2nd place: 6 - 3rd place: 2
Champions: 1st place: 8 - 2nd place: 5 - 3rd place: 2
Cup: 1st place: 3, 2nd place: 1 - 3rd place: 2
ohhh I hate the 4-4-2 -.-''''' alwais problems... and the 4-1-4-1 too xD only can do something with the same 4-4-2... but next matches I will try something new.... a 3-1-5-1 .....or 3-5-1-1 xDDD
(-_-)'
khris let us know if you find a decent counter, I have given up and so they just get 4 4 2 right back at 'em.....
Expressed above is my own opinion. ☻ Your results may vary.
▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB< ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
each strategy has a particular strength, you studied
Du học Đài Loan vừa học vừa làm - Tư vấn Du học Đài Loan chi phí thấp, vừa học vừa làm, hỗ trợ việc làm thêm thu nhập hấp dẫn.
My two cents: I played twice against very similar quality player, this season and these comments will be based on them.
The first game: Match was in his grounds and both of us were in the game. I sticked to 4-1-3N-2 and won confidently, basically thrashed him statistics-wise.
The second game: Match was in my grounds and both of us were watching the game. I started out as 4-1-2-1-2 ND, playing attacking mentality through the middle, with no arrows. He was doing better than me, but didn't have anything more than a single 1-on-1 in the first half and a number of unsuccessful corners. I switched to 4-5-1 V-Style late into the second half, attacking mentality, down both flanks, red arrows on AMs, counter-attack. Stats changed to my favor and I had a number of corners, run through flanks, shoots from distance in last 20 mins since I did the change, while he had complete "nothing". Neither of us was able to score and it ended draw. Man of the match was his goalkeeper! I guess I would have won, if I changed to 4-5-1 V-Style a little sooner, but all those rumors regarding inefficiency of this formation added a lot of hesitation.
P.S. Both of us are very good defense-wise and have a quality goalkeeper.
P.P.S. If I would play against a strong 4-4-2 again, I would still start with Narrow Diamond (conservative) and change to V-Style (risky but efficient), but a lot sooner.