Defensive play with blue arrow"s on 2 def and dm and 1 mc they alle get yellows in a single match i did noticed (strange)
no blue arrows with defensive play for me more
Defensive play with blue arrow"s on 2 def and dm and 1 mc they alle get yellows in a single match i did noticed (strange)
no blue arrows with defensive play for me more
This game is so strange. It may be far from being a proper football tactical game. When you put blue arrows on DCs, the pressure is switched to your team and you may even concede goals. You put blue arrows on MCs, the same thing may happen. It is as if instead from ordering those specific players to be more defensive, they are ordered to be more offensive (the reverse) or careless. Have a look at Buffs Mad thread for the visual part of a match; you will see what I mean. http://forum.topeleven.com/top-eleve...en-screen.html
Last edited by Tactician; 08-04-2015 at 01:57 PM.
buffs screenshot kinda proves the opposite of what you just said considering he has red arrows on the wide players and in those screen shots you can see the wide players higher up the field. There are only 2 out of like 9 that show what you say, which can be attributed to zonal or man to man markings.
What I have said is not based on these pictures only. I have noticed these effects in matches before he posted those images (by adding or removing arrows before or during matches). One of his images shows what may have happened which is why I referred to his post.
'which can be attributed to zonal or man to man markings' What are you talking about? How can this be due to zonal or man-to-man marking?
![]()
Last edited by Tactician; 08-04-2015 at 05:37 PM.
How do you explain this then? You yourself said in your post that you don't know why the defenders were in such positions during some parts of the match.
Have you noticed that during some matches, when a change is made in the orders or a substitution is made, there is a change in 'pressure' or a goal is scored nearly instantly after the change has been applied, and that the change made is not logical to the visible effect that followed? It could be more of a random thing rather than occurring due to the proper selection of orders or proper substitution made. This is what I have said for the blue arrows also. For some matches, when I have put blue arrows on DCs or MCs, it seems that those players became more careless or the effects were negative instead of positive (not tactically logical effects). This applies for red arrows also. This does not occur for every match; it is like 50-50, hence, it could be random. This is not confirmed, but it has a chance that it is like this. It could be a combination of randomness and other ways too.
Last edited by Tactician; 08-05-2015 at 02:52 AM.