View Poll Results: Should this thread be sticky?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll

  • Yes

    12 85.71%

  • No

    2 14.29%
Page 16 of 44 FirstFirst ... 6141516171826 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 160 of 439
Like Tree46Likes

Thread: Definitive Illegal Formation Rules

  1. 04-12-2013 #151
    Fireb Ourne is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Malaysia
    Posts
    26
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-illegal.jpg

    Weirdest formation ever.

    Anyway, do you guys usually try to beat illegal formations using different formations to match them?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 04-12-2013 #152
    Razz is offline
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by Fireb Ourne View Post
    Click image for larger version.  Name: illegal.jpg  Views: 76  Size: 90.0 KB  ID: 5104

    Weirdest formation ever.

    Anyway, do you guys usually try to beat illegal formations using different formations to match them?
    Sure. Against that, you'd put in minimum defenders, maximum attackers.
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 04-13-2013 #153
    Eindbaas is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    5
    So this formation is legal? :

    -----ST--ST---
    ---------------
    ML-----------MR
    ---DMC--DMC-
    DL--DC--DC--DR
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 04-15-2013 #154
    yulyus is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Today saw the match. One team plays 3W-2(DMC)-3W-1-1.
    In the middle of 2-nd half (score 1-1) hid DC was injured. No substitution was done. So the formation appeared as 2(DR+DL)-2(DMC)-3W-1-1. He lost 1-2. But the game continued to be equal !!! He really didn't lost possession. Does it means that playing with 2 defenders is "legal" since today ???
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 04-15-2013 #155
    yulyus is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Eindbaas View Post
    So this formation is legal? :

    -----ST--ST---
    ---------------
    ML-----------MR
    ---DMC--DMC-
    DL--DC--DC--DR
    Yes it's legal (at least in NORDEUS point of view)
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 04-18-2013 #156
    MvdS is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1
    As I have read this post it seems to me as the following should be Ilegal, or?

    ----ST--ST--ST----
    --------AMC-------
    -----MC--MC----
    -------DMC--------
    ----DC--DC----DR--
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 04-20-2013 #157
    adminlvieira is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    1
    Guys... im really lost, i didnt even know there was bad formation...
    i used an formation against the last team "an boot" i was in the first place... and to my surprise i lost 5-0
    the formation was
    Definitive Illegal Formation Rules-team.jpg

    This was an illegal formation?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  8. 04-23-2013 #158
    yulyus is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by adminlvieira View Post
    Guys... im really lost, i didnt even know there was bad formation...
    i used an formation against the last team "an boot" i was in the first place... and to my surprise i lost 5-0
    the formation was
    Click image for larger version.  Name: team.jpg  Views: 68  Size: 49.9 KB  ID: 5510

    This was an illegal formation?

    Yes
    only one defender - illegal formation
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  9. 04-24-2013 #159
    beekhon is offline
    Newbie beekhon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Phnom Penh, Cambodia
    Posts
    4
    It is legal for my format below? Please advice.

    ---ST----ST----
    ------AMC------
    ML----MC----MR
    DL--DC--DC--DR
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  10. 04-26-2013 #160
    giggsy70 is offline
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Bend,Oregon
    Posts
    4
    It is a touchy spot because what if u want to run a 4-2-4 and play long ball to your FWDS.U would then penalize the player for having 4 def 2 mids and 4 fwds..That would not be right.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
Page 16 of 44 FirstFirst ... 6141516171826 ... LastLast
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »