Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Anyone used this formation?

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #2
    Famous Toxcatl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Chile
    Posts
    1,150
    I sometimes use 3n-1-3n-2w-1 and 3n-2n-2n-2w-1. This formations are good against ND and other similiar formations without AML/R or ML/R. The first one works well with Mixed or Flanks attacks, the second one with Flanks attacks mostly. The other orders don't depend on formation at all, no reason to ask for them.

    3n-3n(MC)-2w-2 doesn't look very good: it is vulnerable to both possession attacks (especially through the flanks) and counter-attacks (since it doesn't have DMC). I wouldn't recommend to use it, too specific and unbalanced.
    Last edited by Toxcatl; 02-17-2017 at 10:07 AM.
    It wasn't our day.