4-2-3w-1?

[khris]

Attachment 124581

I read this from another thread

This is not the version I have regarding the bonuses that were created in 2015 and that affected these 2 options.

The associated bonuses that still there, that work in exchange of condition, makes these options something different than the other tactical options, staying these 2 options, out of the taxtical part of the game and just having basically a visual effect, but, not a effect in terms of scenario, in the sense that, low pressure cant have any benefit in a particular situation, and zonal making, the same, for the own concept of these 2 orders having a bonus that is active when we swtch the orders in "high consumption mode".

Khris is not agree.

[khris]

This is not the version I have regarding the bonuses that were created in 2015 and that affected these 2 options.

The associated bonuses that still there, that work in exchange of condition, makes these options something different than the other tactical options, staying these 2 options, out of the taxtical part of the game and just having basically a visual effect, but, not a effect in terms of scenario, in the sense that, low pressure cant have any benefit in a particular situation, and zonal making, the same, for the own concept of these 2 orders having a bonus that is active when we swtch the orders in "high consumption mode".

Khris is not agree.

From this viewpoint, always, will have advantadge, MtM than Zonal, and High pressure vs low.

Another thing is, the tackling, that is reactive, you can see how as the passing style, too reactive, or, when u focuss passing to right or left, this can make the differance as the game will chose a scenario where these options work fine or fail clearly, but this option, isn't posible for these 2 orders for the own nature of these orders.
High always will have advantadge vs low.
MtM, the same vs zonal.

This is my thesis and this is how I play with them.

[Tampano]

This formation is good btw, i can hold it 0-0 until PK. My opponent watch the game while i am not. I am not lucky with PK so i lost.

[tomu741]

For me zonal always have advantage over man to man. Whenever i try man to man - it's so bad. So for me man to man is used maybe with certain formations and/or tactics.

[Tampano]

Anyone please help me counter his formation!
He used 4-2-1-3.
4-5-1 v-style is not working to counter this formation. I lost 0-2 home on the first leg. Second leg is about 48 hours.
Any advice?

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3000 using Tapatalk

[tomu741]

You need 3dc+dmc. So maybe try 3n-1-2-3w-1