Injuries

[Tactician]

only when a hard tackling in orders is set.
as for facilities, the building could continue by the levels- at least typically, following the seat construction progress.

But, hard tackling or not, if the opponent's facilities are not up to the level required or his players have poor condition (like sparklinginsilence said), why should we get penalised for that in terms of yellow or red cards based on the length in injury the player will have to suffer?

[Gasi]

But, hard tackling or not, if the opponent's facilities are not up to the level required or his players have poor condition (like sparklinginsilence said), why should we get penalised for that in terms of yellow or red cards based on the length in injury the player will have to suffer?

I have seen this in real football games, a simple tackle earns a red card because of the injury it caused, or because it happened in the 18 yard box.

[Tactician]

I have seen this in real football games, a simple tackle earns a red card because of the injury it caused, or because it happened in the 18 yard box.

But the problem here is that the injury is also affected by the other teams facilities and the player's condition. Your player may get a red card for a light challenge or foul just because your opponent's player got injured for a long period; the long period may not be because of the type of challenge (type of tackling) but because of the opponent's player's condition or 'outdated' facilities. This is not fair. In fact, this is 'nonsense'.

[Tactician]

Suppose a team has 'outdated facilities' and he has a lot of players in poor condition, say X, before a particular match is started. Does that mean that if his opponent used hard tackling for that match, and X players got injured, the opponent will get around X cards (yellow or red)?