384Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Do you think when you play 4312 is better than 433? I also send you PM.
Do you think when you play 4312 is better than 433? I also send you PM.
Well, when I started playing I used 4-3-3 and went me very well, but with the time, in higher levels I proved the 4-3-1-2 and I have the feeling that is the counter of more formations... I started, during some matches to put a ST or MC as AMC and I obtained good results in some cases... now really I start with the 4-3-1-2.Originally Posted by TheAdix
There are some good formations to use, more stable than others, these are 2 formations that having 4 defenses and people in attack are good to use, but one have to think in another point of this game, and is that the game never select the 11 names of players during the match. One never will see the 11 names of his players. So is interesting have 3 man in MC line and 3 in attack, (ST -AMC) but too, we have to remember that the developers did a game that needs our decisions, we, have to see what happen with the players.
This game is not simply as put a formation with 5 star players and done, thats why I always say that is very important to know if a player is well proggrammed in internal mode, and during the match, if the name of a MC or a ST don't appear during the first 50 minutes, one have to prove a substitution.
The other sub' id for a yellow card, a tired player that we wanna protect of injuerie, or a change near the minute 75'.
About the PM, I am in a moment in wich I don't add more people to play in the main account, but I will add you in the account of Port Vale if you want.
EDITED: well is interesting have 3 in MC and 3 in attack for the same reason that I say that, is interesting to have 6 MC's and 6 ST's... just because with 3 man per line one can see who is working and who don't.
Last edited by khris; 07-12-2014 at 09:48 AM.
Sure you can do that.
On my main account which is on lvl 11 I play different tactic but 433 I start playing on my second account which I create yesterday. We will see.
Reply With Quote
