no, financial setting must be make atleast 5 minute before game because it influence the morale of the player. that why you cant make changes to ur team shortly before match
no, financial setting must be make atleast 5 minute before game because it influence the morale of the player. that why you cant make changes to ur team shortly before match
If I'm tanking a season quite often I play around with formations during a game and there are many times I've been 4 or 5 nil down at half time due to an illegal formation, I change to a 'good' 4-4-2 or suchlike because I know I've lost, and then 'win' the second half by a couple of goals.
My thinking is the 3 minutes before the game it takes the players, formation and orders and works out probabilities, not results. Of course the commentary and play for the first few match minutes is figured out at that time, and so at the end of the match the last few match minutes is playing out, the result completely determined then because you cannot effect any changes at that point that it will have time to compute.
And while I know changes you make are not instant, they do seem to take effect about as soon as the fastest sub you see.. your results in delay vary by your internet/ping to the server as well as your opponents if he is present.
I have turned games around by changes I have made to orders and also subs/formation changes.
I have also *lost* games by making the wrong changes.
Last edited by Cat Harrison; 03-15-2014 at 12:52 PM. Reason: clarity
Expressed above is my own opinion. ☻ Your results may vary.
▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB< ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Well my observetions are quite different. Any changes you make do not affect the game at all. What happens is that teams quite often perfom differently on each half of the game even if you don't make any change. ex. You score 5 goals on first half and then, without any changes, you score only one or no goals on second or the other way around. This is quite easy to observe if you play a lot of friendlies against the same team.
Not results, I mean probabilities if no one is present and no changes are made. If no one is there then I do suppose then the probabilities become results.
Expressed above is my own opinion. ☻ Your results may vary.
▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ >BvB< ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬▬ ▬ ▬
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Exactly.
I have three accounts and I make tests on one of them. I've won as much the same games, if not more, by staying out than by being present as a manager. I manage the same amount of comebacks present or not present. And I manage the same amount of comebacks if I am present and do substitutions or no substitutions. It just doesn't make any difference. It doesn't.
The penalties are proven to be decided beforehand, there's no question about that. It's there for you to test, while they don't cover up the bug. Period. So, probably the rest is decided as well.
If games that go into extra-time have taken much longer before going in play, what does this tell you? Coincidence?
Anyway, this was my team that won the Champions League completely undefeated (10-3-0), completely unmanaged:
Explain.
Last edited by Celtic; 03-16-2014 at 09:14 AM.
EXACTLY!!!
There's this team I befriended and that I often beat by circa 9-0.
Look at this lol...
Sometimes my team scores 6 goals in the first 25 minutes!!! then 3 in the rest of the game.
Sometimes they score 5 in the first 80 minutes then 4 in the remaining 10 even if I make one substitution every minute just to prevent the team from playing, they'll score between substitutions like they are desperately trying to reach 9-0, lol, scoring goals while running to the bench.
Not really. I've experienced numerous occasions where the second corner did not result in a goal. It's just flavor commentary, stop putting so much emphasis on it. The game already decided that you are going to concede a goal or not. The rest is just to make it interesting to follow.