I won`t use foul language BUT HOW XXXX

[spornybol]

[spornybol]

[Amane Ito]

Looks like he dominated the pitch.

Whole team with subpar form is a sign of the formation being countered badly.
You could have moved your DL to DMC to reverse-counter his formation if you ask me.

[Tactician]

Looks like he dominated the pitch.

Whole team with subpar form is a sign of the formation being countered badly.
You could have moved your DL to DMC to reverse-counter his formation if you ask me.

I agree, but explain the two cases shown below. One is for my team, and one is for another team in the same league.

[khris]

I agree, but explain the two cases shown below. One is for my team, and one is for another team in the same league.

There's nothing to explain really, the differance really is close in both cases, and then all depend of internal factors, match scenario and other stuffs.

+5 advantadge in some attributes is not, and can not give a definitive result.
And the SA's we talked many times that are not guarantee of anything.
One can not pretend have +1 star in general Q. and assure 3 points.

No.

[Tactician]

There's nothing to explain really, the differance really is close in both cases, and then all depend of internal factors, match scenario and other stuffs.

+5 advantadge in some attributes is not, and can not give a definitive result.
And the SA's we talked many times that are not guarantee of anything.
One can not pretend have +1 star in general Q. and assure 3 points.

No.

Have a look at the formations used.

For the first case, it is 33.5 vs. 26.2 (starting 11). For the second case, it is 34.2 vs 27.7 (starting 11).

[khris]

Have a look at the formations used.

It is more than 2 stars in quality difference.

Not enough.
Case 1, +15 stars with all players, case 2, +16, really the situation is generally+1 and then, count, the game never select all players, there's an scenario, scenario can depend for example of the position of the teams in the classification. Then 1 good player with a good day can kill the game, or test and have a the correct man in fouls/corners can make the differance... and more things..

34 seasons looking matches tells me that if you want a guarantee 90%... maybe the line starts in +3 stars... and we can see more matches and the conclusion probably will be more radical...LOL

[khris]

no excuses really ehh^^,,, ..¬¬'

[Tactician]

I made some corrections. See the post again.
What 'not enough' ? What kind of team would be enough, an 8 star team maybe? This is nonsense, especially when considering the formations used. Stop defending something that is wrong.

[khris]

I made some corrections. See the post again.
What 'not enough' ? What kind of team would be enough then, an 8 star team maybe? This is nonsense, especially when considering the formations used. Stop defending something that is wrong.

+7Q never was, and never have to be enough to give a "automatic victory".
When I say not enough, I want to say "not enough to assure chances of victory between the 90%".

And I assure you, a 3* player can be more well proggrammed internally in effectiveness terms than a 6* or a 7*.
Then, there's teh Quality, internal quality, chances in the match, and for the simulation the chances are or fail or win for the player that tryes. So is not that simple, and is not that wrong.