I won`t use foul language BUT HOW XXXX

[Tactician]

Looks like he dominated the pitch.

Whole team with subpar form is a sign of the formation being countered badly.
You could have moved your DL to DMC to reverse-counter his formation if you ask me.

I agree, but explain the two cases shown below. One is for my team, and one is for another team in the same league.

[khris]

I agree, but explain the two cases shown below. One is for my team, and one is for another team in the same league.

There's nothing to explain really, the differance really is close in both cases, and then all depend of internal factors, match scenario and other stuffs.

+5 advantadge in some attributes is not, and can not give a definitive result.
And the SA's we talked many times that are not guarantee of anything.
One can not pretend have +1 star in general Q. and assure 3 points.

No.

[Tactician]

There's nothing to explain really, the differance really is close in both cases, and then all depend of internal factors, match scenario and other stuffs.

+5 advantadge in some attributes is not, and can not give a definitive result.
And the SA's we talked many times that are not guarantee of anything.
One can not pretend have +1 star in general Q. and assure 3 points.

No.

Have a look at the formations used.

For the first case, it is 33.5 vs. 26.2 (starting 11). For the second case, it is 34.2 vs 27.7 (starting 11).

[khris]

Have a look at the formations used.

It is more than 2 stars in quality difference.

Not enough.
Case 1, +15 stars with all players, case 2, +16, really the situation is generally+1 and then, count, the game never select all players, there's an scenario, scenario can depend for example of the position of the teams in the classification. Then 1 good player with a good day can kill the game, or test and have a the correct man in fouls/corners can make the differance... and more things..

34 seasons looking matches tells me that if you want a guarantee 90%... maybe the line starts in +3 stars... and we can see more matches and the conclusion probably will be more radical...LOL