I won`t use foul language BUT HOW XXXX

[spornybol]

[spornybol]

[spornybol]

[muskrat]

he scored more goals than you.

[talisman]

Post team line-ups with ratings and we'd have a bit more of a chance of analysing the match...

[Gert Funck]

can we please see some skill differences?

[Blok 45]

Everything is possible. Unfortunately I was the victim... And just think that his second attacker was a DML/ML from the 5th minute due to an injury

[Gert Funck]

Everything is possible. Unfortunately I was the victim... And just think that his second attacker was a DML/ML from the 5th minute due to an injury

stupid formation, and stupid result IMO

8-0 would had made more sense to me

[cookizzz]

Everything is possible. Unfortunately I was the victim... And just think that his second attacker was a DML/ML from the 5th minute due to an injury

This is a crazy formation. If the match simulation is good, the team adopting this formation will loss in this match. But the match simulation engine is not good enough. I understand it is not easy. So the illegal formation is meaningful! it at least punishes the team adopting such crazy formation. Even if illegal formation restriction is still in place, the team using it may not lose. Ball procession is not very important factor to match result. So in my opinion, the managers who like freedom to use formation can use some illegal formation if they want. They will just suffer slightly.

P.S. For those who don't know, formation with 1 defender is used to be a illegal formation. The ball procession will be changed to 80:20.

[Cat Harrison]

just really bad result, illegal formations were better than that, it seems to me that even though there were some nonsensical scores, that happened less..