MC/r AMC/r ?

[narc]

Hello guys, I bought really good ml and mr for m 4-4-2 formation. Im wondering if it makes big difference to put ML to AML or MR to AMR in case i want to play 4-5-1v style for example ? Logically it shouldnt make big difference but dunno if it is in-game. Thanks

[khris]

Hello guys, I bought really good ml and mr for m 4-4-2 formation. Im wondering if it makes big difference to put ML to AML or MR to AMR in case i want to play 4-5-1v style for example ? Logically it shouldnt make big difference but dunno if it is in-game. Thanks

I only buy DC's-MC's-ST's and as AMC I select a MC or ST, just have a possession penalty of 1% or 2% but 90% cases do not have bad effect.

Only in few cases, for example use MC as DMC can result in more fouls or a penalty but that depend of the internal configuration of the player, because a MC programmed to help well in defense usually do not do these mistakes.
So you know, no problema.
Good luck^^

[cookizzz]

In the past, I occasionally push MR or ML up and don't find any major problem.

Now all my teams always keeps 4 wingers including 2 AMR and 2 AML. These players are key players of my teams for a long time.. All these players have dual role. I prefer 1 or 2 of them can also play AMC and other can play MR or ML.

With these players in team, I usually play 4-5-1v or 4-3n-2(AMR/AML)-1, but can switch to other formation like 4-4-2 easily. This greatly improve flexibility. I do not want too many AMC because I personally do not like formation focusing in central. Besides, for example, with a AMC/AMR and AMR/MR can play together with least conflict in positions.

[narc]

So, krish. I dont know if you understand me corectly, If player is strictly ML so not ML/AML like some players have (like 2 position). Im talking about 1 position player for example ML, is it problem to play on AML spot or its not ? Sorry for missuderstood.

Part which confused me is that i just saw on transfer market that there is ML-AML player ( with 2 positions ) so dunno if I can push ML to AML anymore if he is strictly ML. Thanks

[excpomelo]

I have tried this and this team has a certain effect

[tr2anh]

If u think of switching from 442 to 451v in match, u should buy ML/AML and MR/AMR from the start

[khris]

So, krish. I dont know if you understand me corectly, If player is strictly ML so not ML/AML like some players have (like 2 position). Im talking about 1 position player for example ML, is it problem to play on AML spot or its not ? Sorry for missuderstood.

Part which confused me is that i just saw on transfer market that there is ML-AML player ( with 2 positions ) so dunno if I can push ML to AML anymore if he is strictly ML. Thanks

I understand you perfectly, thats why I explain, that I use MC or ST (with single role) , as AMC, and for 1 player in position with yellow or orange triangle, believe me, it doesn't matter.

Different if you use 3-4-5 players in a position not trained, then maybe you will see a negative effect in chances, but for 1 player, no.

[Brian Dang]

Should not be a big problem...i did it sometimes too... I have 1 aml/ml and 1 only ml player..when the guy with 2 roles had red card or injured, i use the one with ml as aml and it worked perfectly well..maybe 1-2% quality dropped ..not the big deal...

[Joseph Sjarifudin]

I understand you perfectly, thats why I explain, that I use MC or ST (with single role) , as AMC, and for 1 player in position with yellow or orange triangle, believe me, it doesn't matter.

Different if you use 3-4-5 players in a position not trained, then maybe you will see a negative effect in chances, but for 1 player, no.

Like my old match, I put DL position player to DMR position while match

[cookizzz]

I heard many successful attempts to use players in 2nd positions. But testing should be necessary to verify if the player can adapt to the position in related formation