16Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Someone from Nordeus said that it is up to the user to find out such things. They won't confirm things or give significant clues about those. The same applies for things like arrows and so on. Remember when you told me that putting an 2 arrows in one formation make this be the same as another formation, and what I told you? Yet, I'm sure you still don't see it this way. Don't you think that if it was only a matter of arrows, then why do other formations exist? There is a difference between a red-arrowed MR and a neutral AMR. The same applies for the other positions. If you still can't see why, look more. If you still don't see, it is ok. Not all people are on the same level. You helped me, and I returned you the favour by telling you something that you did not know. Do you think that I would tell you such a thing if I was not sure about it? If ever I say something that I am not sure about, I will use words like probably, maybe and so on. So, if a user don't know when such words are used and why, that is his problem, or maybe should I start doing some English classes here as well? Do you think that I want to mislead you or other users? I will never mislead someone though I might stay quiet on some things because not all things can be revealed to anyone. I made many conclusions about this game after a lot of observations; I shared many of them. I do not post the data part, but this does not mean that I don't have enough proof of some things or things like that. Users are free to believe in what they want, but if ever they are penalised for believing in something that is wrong or is bad, then they are responsible to some extent. One main problem in this world is that people tend to believe more in lies rather than in truth.
By the way, even people from Nordeus tell lies to users. I won't say who and who, and on what. But, I have noticed some things. So, do not always trust what comes out from them. Always take everything with a grain of salt.
