Results 1 to 10 of 33
Like Tree25Likes

Thread: Uneven playing field

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Greek Forum Moderator nikolgiorgos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    17,714
    With the introduction af associations, where the team level doesnt matter and the quality is based on relative for the team on their own level, the same method could be used in CHL (and CUP).
    a similar proposition was written about the cup.
    But there is a major problem.
    Those features (stars independent from the levels) are from new version.
    The old version isn't compatible with that (so we can't play asc. games with the old game).
    So this can be only if they stop the old version.
    But with this, many players would stop playing the game.
    Some of them because they don't like the old version and the others because they don't have the hardware to play with the new one.
    It's a RAM eater, with connection problems so people who don't have systems with at least 4 GB RAM and excellent internet connection cannot follow the game.
    With Unity , I don't believe things can improve a lot in the future.
    So, would they risk to loose 1/3 , 1/4 of all the players of the game at once ?
    I don't think so.
    HairDryer and Bunzo like this.
    Καλώς ήρθατε στο Ελληνικό φόρουμ
    http://forum.topeleven.com/%CE%93%CE...%B4%CE%B1.html

  2. #2
    Rookie Alfyan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Midgar, Sector 7
    Posts
    103
    Quote Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos View Post
    a similar proposition was written about the cup.
    But there is a major problem.
    Those features (stars independent from the levels) are from new version.
    The old version isn't compatible with that (so we can't play asc. games with the old game).
    So this can be only if they stop the old version.
    But with this, many players would stop playing the game.
    Some of them because they don't like the old version and the others because they don't have the hardware to play with the new one.
    It's a RAM eater, with connection problems so people who don't have systems with at least 4 GB RAM and excellent internet connection cannot follow the game.
    With Unity , I don't believe things can improve a lot in the future.
    So, would they risk to loose 1/3 , 1/4 of all the players of the game at once ?
    I don't think so.
    Well, ironically those exact people will inevitably come across the situation stated in the OP and quit because of that regardless lol; its just delaying the inevitable. Who would want to play a game if they can't give you a level playing field? You can't say you are competing fairly, its like everyone in your competition is allowed to dope to get an advantage while you are permanently handicapped for seasons on end.

    Off-topic.. I still use the old-version because the new one is not compatible with my browser and I tried all the troubleshoot that was suggested already but to no avail. Also I found that I can actually play the players loaned to me through associations on the old version browser

  3. #3
    Addicted
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by nikolgiorgos View Post
    a similar proposition was written about the cup.
    But there is a major problem.
    Those features (stars independent from the levels) are from new version.
    The old version isn't compatible with that (so we can't play asc. games with the old game).
    So this can be only if they stop the old version.
    But with this, many players would stop playing the game.
    Some of them because they don't like the old version and the others because they don't have the hardware to play with the new one.
    It's a RAM eater, with connection problems so people who don't have systems with at least 4 GB RAM and excellent internet connection cannot follow the game.
    With Unity , I don't believe things can improve a lot in the future.
    So, would they risk to loose 1/3 , 1/4 of all the players of the game at once ?
    I don't think so.
    but then they should not use the term "fair" for limiting the video free pack!!! if they are not fixing the "unfair" CUP!!
    just tell us " we want $$, that why we limited the video free pack" --> this i still can accept ~
    but now, they are saying "it is because we make it fair" ---> this is a LIE when this action compare to the unfair CUP they know for a long time, we complain for a lot for long time too!!!

    and don't you notice??? if we are talking about the unfair CUP, moi (or other has power) never (or 95% won't) come in to reply!!!
    but if now you are complain about the limiting the video free pack, they come in and say "make it fair" and even close the topic (they close the last topic that has lots of discussion about the video limit) .... this is like, what the hack?

    This is about the honest !!
    Last edited by Ahlony Wong; 08-03-2016 at 10:32 PM.
    John Bednar likes this.