Key attributes, my theory

[nikolgiorgos]

I agree with what LarryC is saying at post #3
i played for a long time the old version (where there was the limit of +- 20 is the skills of the players)
i played both versions together (some times doing the training or watching games in both)
Now I 'm playing only with the new version
but I can't see any difference in game's mechanics.

The only difference I can see is between the official games (of the 3 competitions) and the asso games.
But I cannot figure out how it works there.

[Tactician]

I agree with what LarryC is saying at post #3
i played for a long time the old version (where there was the limit of +- 20 is the skills of the players)
i played both versions together (some times doing the training or watching games in both)
Now I 'm playing only with the new version
but I can't see nay difference in game's mechanics.

The only difference I can see is between the official games (of the 3 competitions) and the asso games.
But I cannot figure out how it works there.

Probably because there is not much difference between the old version and the new version, else how could it be that the old version was still working 'in parallel' with the new version.

Many things in the new version could be just cosmetic or some have some effect but not what they are meant to based on their description or what they appear to be visually or in terms of words. If a company can go as far as that fake sell to auction thing to deceive players, you can think how much other fake or deceiving things there could be in this game.

So far, individual attributes don't seem to have the effect they are expected to have. What seems to have an effect is the overall quality and maybe the overall quality per group (attack, defence and physical).

By the way, in football, since when strikers and defensive wingers don't need fitness?