Do you like the idea of skipping Levels ?

[nikolgiorgos]

That's why I suggested the idea of DEGRADING in parallel with skipping levels (go down one level at least ) teams who don't train enough their team/ buy better players / below 8th position / or abandoned their team.

- That's a very bad suggestion.
Remember all those pro tanking teams (mostly the Turks and others) in top100.
They will end at LV1 with all the benefits (stadium, sources, experience ...)

No body has yet answered my question : why does a team who is abandoned by his manager stays in league 56 for example for 3 months and then the system replace his old players and stays in same level longer, while many active / ambitious/ skilled/ or maybe rich managers are ready to take his place ?

LV56 it's time you 're playing the game and where are you know.
Doesn't mean that a Championship of LV56 is better than a championship of LV26.
Or a manager of LV56 is better than a manager of LV56.
When I was here in the forum as LV12 manager, with 10 months experience in the forum, I was giving advice or info to managers from levels 20 or 30.

[USARABAT]

- That's a very bad suggestion.
Remember all those pro tanking teams (mostly the Turks and others) in top100.
They will end at LV1 with all the benefits (stadium, sources, experience ...)

Kindly explain in detail why is it bad ?

I imagine it as following: If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80% and if this manager didn't improve his team ( didn't watch / train/ buy players) will go down one more and his players will be 60 % and so on .... until he returns to level 1 with 1% power players ... that's how I imagine it ... so how do u see that they can abuse this idea ?

[Toxcatl]

If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80%

C'mon, you can't be that ignorant.

[USARABAT]

Answer instead of acting like a cloon

I have posed some good questions in my main topic and some of my comments but yet no body have answered them yet. I colored them in red now , maybe you will pay more attention.

[khris]

Answer instead of acting like a cloon

I have posed some good questions in my main topic and some of my comments but yet no body have answered them yet. I colored them in red now , maybe you will pay more attention.

justb to point,

"If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80%"

100% wins level =80%
100% loses level = becomes a 120%

The "internal skills" that works in levels of 5 still been the same as in the old versions... as said, the only way to have a relegation zone in conditions, (knowing that the game will not touch the "base" of the players doing a substraction of skills, is auto sell the +5* players... then you are relegated with the 5* as 6*... fair.

[USARABAT]

"If team X has now 100% was degraded , his team will go down one level and become 80%"
100% wins level =80%
100% loses level = becomes a 120%

Solving the tanking (intentional) behavior shouldn't be a big fuss and should be punished by :
1- Degrading one level to make them lose -20% instead of remaining in same level to be able to add 20% more ...
2- Closure of training facilities until they promote to the above level. (Training won't add more skills to players but increase bonus only)


Anyhow

To sum up the ideas of this topic :
A- Punish careless managers + intentional tankers by degradation + the closure of training facilities
B- Reward skilled smart + rich managers by the option of skipping one/three level each month.
( ex- allow the manager who wins the league and why not the runner up the option to skip one league if he wants to )
C- Allow everybody to buy 7/8/9 stars players BEFORE THE LEAGUE DRAW through auction as long as they have enough resources ...