Make the game more fair for everyone (no use to tank anymore)

[maloukees]

I was thinking that it is a good idea to try to make more fair game for everyone.

Like the tankers for the association games.. Play only in the weekend. and make the league not fair etc.

So Nordeus why not remove 20% of our strength from all the teams???

Just like in Association games, that will make the competions between managers more fair.

No use to tank anymore for anyone...

At least it is something to think about.

[dave1311]

Been suggested many times in many threads.

[nikolgiorgos]

The problem is with asso platinum top100.
i 'm playing the game 4 years and before asso, there wasn't any problem.

So Nordeus why not remove 20% of our strength from all the teams??

?
So those asso tricksters will have easier opponents

[KenoticFC]

Niko is right. Honestly tanking does not give you any benefits if you play normally.

[rogerniceguy]

Niko is right. Honestly tanking does not give you any benefits if you play normally.

Indeed I imagine in asso you just get tougher draw. I'm always an advocate in my association for keeping our quality down as much as possible. I have a significant tanker problem in my cl this season tho. Will post pics in a mo

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

[Altiplano]

Niko is right. Honestly tanking does not give you any benefits if you play normally.

Mmmm, not so sure about that.
My 1st team, Altiplano tanked last year for the first time. I did it with a 7 star team. I did it to help our association with loans (which were removed before the end of the season! Lol.) Also to escape a couple of teams that were going to give me problems.
Since that season tanking Altiplano has won 7 leagues, 4 champions leagues ( plus runner up and beaten semi finalist), and 5 cups (plus runner up). In that lot were 3 of my 7 trebles.
I doubt that I would have had that much success without that tanking season. Would I do it again? Yes, if the circumstances were right.
Nordeus are happy to let teams tank and I can understand their reasons. However repetitive tanking (which I have been guilty of doing with my 2nd team) shouldn't be allowed to continue without penalisation.

[KenoticFC]

Mmmm, not so sure about that.
My 1st team, Altiplano tanked last year for the first time. I did it with a 7 star team. I did it to help our association with loans (which were removed before the end of the season! Lol.) Also to escape a couple of teams that were going to give me problems.
Since that season tanking Altiplano has won 7 leagues, 4 champions leagues ( plus runner up and beaten semi finalist), and 5 cups (plus runner up). In that lot were 3 of my 7 trebles.
I doubt that I would have had that much success without that tanking season. Would I do it again? Yes, if the circumstances were right.
Nordeus are happy to let teams tank and I can understand their reasons. However repetitive tanking (which I have been guilty of doing with my 2nd team) shouldn't be allowed to continue without penalisation.

I was mostly talking about when you play normally. For the longest time I was playing higher level teams in all competitions. The last 2 seasons I have kept only 8 key players and I have lowered my team at the end which has actually helped me playing same level reams. Of course tanking has benefits, Im gonna do it next season because I have bought many scouts in the last 3 seasons and they are not gaining much skills.

[nikolgiorgos]

Mmmm, not so sure about that.
My 1st team, Altiplano tanked last year for the first time. I did it with a 7 star team. I did it to help our association with loans (which were removed before the end of the season! Lol.) Also to escape a couple of teams that were going to give me problems.
Since that season tanking Altiplano has won 7 leagues, 4 champions leagues ( plus runner up and beaten semi finalist), and 5 cups (plus runner up). In that lot were 3 of my 7 trebles.
I doubt that I would have had that much success without that tanking season. Would I do it again? Yes, if the circumstances were right.
Nordeus are happy to let teams tank and I can understand their reasons. However repetitive tanking (which I have been guilty of doing with my 2nd team) shouldn't be allowed to continue without penalisation.

As I said (me and other members) some other times, asso top100 is the root of all evil.
This is destroying the game.
Tanking at old times was using as a tool
- to make a break
- to avoid some unbeatable opponent
- to make a little stronger and competitive team (as there were managers who could gather 1500-2000 greens per season and some others none - depend from the country)

But nobody was doing a permanent tanking of 7-8-9 seasons.

Every time you 're facing such an issue, think if this would exist without the asso top100 tricksters ?

[maloukees]

Nikolgiorgos,

I mean remove 20% from all the teams even the ones NOT promoted.. so in time the 160% teams now will go in lower in time..

Maybe it is good to make a cap or max of 130% per season

So in the new season the strongest teams have tops 110%. so every one has a change against them..

[khris]

Nikolgiorgos,

I mean remove 20% from all the teams even the ones NOT promoted.. so in time the 160% teams now will go in lower in time..

Maybe it is good to make a cap or max of 130% per season

So in the new season the strongest teams have tops 110%. so every one has a change against them..

Technically it is difficult to implement, we've seen suggestions like this since time ago and knowing the game mechanics I guess can't be done.

It would be more easy to close the training for players that achieve the 8* if there's no promotion.

Think but, that the game creates the competitions in relation with the own AvQ, so really is not always a real advantage when you stay at same level continuously..