Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42
Like Tree11Likes

Thread: Do we need two goalkeepers?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Apprentice influenze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    200
    The other team will have 80% posession
    Quote Originally Posted by herdo View Post
    It wouldnt be an illegal formation, merely a player not playing in his natural position
    Currently playing level 8 (season 8)

    The league:
    1st place level 1,2,3,4,5,6,7

    The Champions league:
    1st place level 2,3,4,5,6 - 2nd place level 7

    The cup:
    1/4 final level 3

  2. #2
    Moderator casper™'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    1,499
    I don't remember one injury or a red card in any GK... But I've two, just in case...

  3. #3
    Champion Ljepoje's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    2,955
    I have 2GK (both 7*) and 22yr resp 24yr old. But due my first seasons (lvl 1 and 2) I only had one. Got my GK injured last week but managed to play "without" him for about 65min...gonna love that "bug"
    PROUD MANAGER OF...
    ____________________***______________________


  4. #4
    Pro
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    858
    Illegal formation is only if you don't have a player in a GK position but not if MC plays GK.
    KoHearts likes this.

  5. #5
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by herdo View Post
    It wouldnt be an illegal formation, merely a player not playing in his natural position
    Quote Originally Posted by magic3 View Post
    Illegal formation is only if you don't have a player in a GK position but not if MC plays GK.
    OK. If you say so. Do let us know how that works out for you, k?
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  6. #6
    Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by Razz View Post
    OK. If you say so. Do let us know how that works out for you, k?

    Let me explain it to you. Lets say i set my team up 4-4-2, this is a legal formation, yes? Now lets say i play a MC in goal, still keeping it a 4-4-2, a legal formation with a player out of position, playing the wrong role or what ever you want to call it. Playing an MC in goal wont do you any favours but you wont incur the 80/20 penalty you would if you played an ACTUAL illegal formation.

    I even went to the bother of testing this in a friendly, played a 4-1-2-1-2 (W), with a DMC in goal. I had 50% possession, won 1 nil and the dmc in goal scored a 6.

    I aslo consulted this thread, http://forum.topeleven.com/formation...ion-rules.html
    I noticed YOU wrote it, you may want to go and change the topic from "definitive" because it clearly isnt, you may also want to amend the line which reads "Goalkeeper (Must be player's natural position i.e. a GK)".

    If your going to try and be a smart arse at least know what the **** you are talking about, KKKKKKKKKKKAAAAAYYYYYYY????

    Also, i think people shouldnt be allowed to compose "difinitive" guides when they clearly dont know what there talking about
    cracicot likes this.

  7. #7
    Addicted Razz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    State of Montana, USA
    Posts
    586
    Quote Originally Posted by herdo View Post
    xxx
    While that may have changed (how about some screenshots?), the indicators were still there as recently as last week. I have encountered this situation quite literally dozens of times: An otherwise legal formation with 80/20 possession invariably has a player other than a GK playing keeper.

    In case it escaped you, that thread was a community effort that I started to try and definitively nail down the rules of what we refer to as an "illegal formation." Since the thread was started, there have been several modifications to what we know. Either we, collectively, had it wrong, or something changed in the game engine.

    Please feel free to start, continually test, and maintain your own version of the thread. Since I only have one team and I prefer to actually play the game rather than continuously test, the thread as it is now relies entirely on the community to post evidence of any new developments. You know, something YOU could have done instead of resorting to expletives and personal insults. I fully support and encourage your version of the the thread. When can we expect it? And will you commit to maintaining, testing, and updating it?
    ~^~*~^~ My opinions are best when taken with a grain of salt. No iodine added. ~^~*~^~

  8. #8
    Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by Razz View Post
    While that may have changed (how about some screenshots?), the indicators were still there as recently as last week. I have encountered this situation quite literally dozens of times: An otherwise legal formation with 80/20 possession invariably has a player other than a GK playing keeper.

    In case it escaped you, that thread was a community effort that I started to try and definitively nail down the rules of what we refer to as an "illegal formation." Since the thread was started, there have been several modifications to what we know. Either we, collectively, had it wrong, or something changed in the game engine.

    Please feel free to start, continually test, and maintain your own version of the thread. Since I only have one team and I prefer to actually play the game rather than continuously test, the thread as it is now relies entirely on the community to post evidence of any new developments. You know, something YOU could have done instead of resorting to expletives and personal insults. I fully support and encourage your version of the the thread. When can we expect it? And will you commit to maintaining, testing, and updating it?
    Im not putting up screen shots, im hardly going to make my results up (though looks like you did). Its your name on the post on the definitive bla bla bla thread or did someone else write that n you stole it? I new youd blame a change in the game engine, seems to be par for the course when you really meant to say "i dont know". Ive also only one account and played one game to disprove what you said and prove what i already knew (which was backed up by another forum member). Ive absolutely no intention of making my own thread about illegal formations, the "collective " one is generally fine. "smart arse" personal insult, really lol??

    Basically, dont try and scoff at/belittle people on here when infact what you are saying is a load of tripe!

  9. #9
    Famous shwanko07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,208
    Quote Originally Posted by herdo View Post
    Let me explain it to you. Lets say i set my team up 4-4-2, this is a legal formation, yes? Now lets say i play a MC in goal, still keeping it a 4-4-2, a legal formation with a player out of position, playing the wrong role or what ever you want to call it. Playing an MC in goal wont do you any favours but you wont incur the 80/20 penalty you would if you played an ACTUAL illegal formation.

    I even went to the bother of testing this in a friendly, played a 4-1-2-1-2 (W), with a DMC in goal. I had 50% possession, won 1 nil and the dmc in goal scored a 6.

    I aslo consulted this thread, http://forum.topeleven.com/formation...ion-rules.html
    I noticed YOU wrote it, you may want to go and change the topic from "definitive" because it clearly isnt, you may also want to amend the line which reads "Goalkeeper (Must be player's natural position i.e. a GK)".

    If your going to try and be a smart arse at least know what the **** you are talking about, KKKKKKKKKKKAAAAAYYYYYYY????

    Also, i think people shouldnt be allowed to compose "difinitive" guides when they clearly dont know what there talking about
    same results in my tests ..
    herdo and cracicot like this.
    my team @ http://forum.topeleven.com/team-show...ears-fc-2.html
    League : winner (S1, S2, S3, S6, S7) , runner up (S4*, S5*) * was in holiday away
    CL: Winner (S4, S7), runner up (S2, S3, S5, S6)
    Cup: Winner (S3)

  10. #10
    Pro
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    751
    Quote Originally Posted by shwanko07 View Post
    same results in my tests ..
    Its been that way for at least three months, cheers for backing it up though
    cracicot likes this.

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast