Do we need two goalkeepers?

[n053859]

I prefer set 2 team , Team A for League another team for cup

[dicky]

i only have 1 keeper i use to have 2. he got injured in a game but the glitch saw me through ok. i stuck my best defender in goal and he got a 7 lol. however my keeper was one of the most consistent never lower than a 7 but now he always gets a 5 or 4 even if he keeps a clean sheet. not sure if his injury messed him up or coz the game recognizes he is the only GK in team but he is rubbish now.

[July Fourth]

I think 2 GK is always needed.

1. You never know of injuries/suspensions in this game
2. Squad rotation for less important or easier fixtures or friendlies if you play those.

[shwanko07]

I think 2 GK is always needed.

1. You never know of injuries/suspensions in this game
2. Squad rotation for less important or easier fixtures or friendlies if you play those.

- did you ever seen a GK get a card?
- my CB played as GK when injured for 70 min and kept a clean sheet .. in case of emergencies .. engine $ucks
- this is why you have red packs ... i keep 15 always in hand for my GK when get injured

[cracicot]

- did you ever seen a GK get a card?
- my CB played as GK when injured for 70 min and kept a clean sheet .. in case of emergencies .. engine $ucks
- this is why you have red packs ... i keep 15 always in hand for my GK when get injured

Hey! this is a football simulation (HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA!) A GK can get a card in a real game, so suffice to say it can happen in T11.

Dood, a player can get a red for SPITTING on another player in this game. So is it so unbelievable to have a GK get a card of ANY colour???

[herdo]

also, i dont see how the indicators have been there since last week, ive been playing a few monts now and have always thought a player out of position to be just that and not a illegal formation

[Nampion Chancy]

I CAN post screenshots from last week, from a game I watched.

Again, this is a situation I have personally seen dozens of times, and others brpoght up in the illegal formation thread - an otherwise legal formation, with 80/20 possession. Invariably there's a non-GK playing keeper. Does that matter to you? No. Because after all, I'm just "making things up", right?

If a non-GK at keeper is not the reason for the possession penalty in the above case, and the dozens of others like it, then either a) there's some other explanation and the fact that every time it comes up there's a non GK at keeper is sheer coincidence (several dozen times???) or b) there's been a change in the game.

Have a nice day. I hope things get better for you. It must really suck to have to live with your attitude.

Razz, I am at season 5 and get the same finding as you have: if a team is at 20% possession and have a " legal" formation , I check who is playing goalkeeper and 100% of the time ... It's not a real GK... Hardo likes to argue with everybody, don't take it personally ... And he thinks he has the supreme knowledge!!!

[Razz]

Ah, but he's "proved me wrong", whatever that means - We have three of us encountering this situation within the last week (which constitutes 'proof' for Herdo, unless it doesn't support what he says?), with Cracicot encountering it twice AFTER Herdo's claim. So I don't know what to make of it. There MUST be a logical answer, since we're dealing with computer code, but I can't figure out what it is.

My best guess is that maybe there's a heavy possession penalty rather than an outright illegal formation penalty? Herdos screenshots would seem to counter that, but I suspect the formations shown weren't the ones played the entire match - 49% seems very high with 1 midfielder vs 3 and equal level teams ..

I don't know. The devs won't give us a direct answer on this, so we'll just have to keep an eye on it and see if we get more information or if someone comes up with a plausible answer.

Oh, btw, if I was a 'smart arse' or if I was 'a hypocrite about personal insults', I sure don't see where. Maybe when you dish it out you start seeing your own medicine where there isn't any. *shrug*. I certainly could respond in kind, and it would be crystal clear that I meant personal insult, but frankly my curiousity about this issue has the best of me and I'd rather not have the thread locked just yet.

[herdo]

Ah, but he's "proved me wrong", whatever that means - We have three of us encountering this situation within the last week (which constitutes 'proof' for Herdo, unless it doesn't support what he says?), with Cracicot encountering it twice AFTER Herdo's claim. So I don't know what to make of it. There MUST be a logical answer, since we're dealing with computer code, but I can't figure out what it is.

My best guess is that maybe there's a heavy possession penalty rather than an outright illegal formation penalty? Herdos screenshots would seem to counter that, but I suspect the formations shown weren't the ones played the entire match - 49% seems very high with 1 midfielder vs 3 and equal level teams ..

I don't know. The devs won't give us a direct answer on this, so we'll just have to keep an eye on it and see if we get more information or if someone comes up with a plausible answer.

Oh, btw, if I was a 'smart arse' or if I was 'a hypocrite about personal insults', I sure don't see where. Maybe when you dish it out you start seeing your own medicine where there isn't any. *shrug*. I certainly could respond in kind, and it would be crystal clear that I meant personal insult, but frankly my curiousity about this issue has the best of me and I'd rather not have the thread locked just yet.

Those screens are 100% legit and i never changed the formation at all. I always play wide players against narrow teams and it works well. Its not a heavy possession penalty either as i had 49% all game. Im thinking that maybe playing a defender in goals doesnt incur the 80/20 penalty that playing a striker does? other than that my "supreme" knowledge (lol) is stumped.

Thoughts??