Originally Posted by SuperDunk
Yeah, next season but, we will do something that will need a little bit more effort, and will be a double criteria using 2 players like now, earning 1st Ratings and to undo draws, MotM.
Ofc. this can have a little bit of manipùlation -MotM-, doing a sub, not sure if include some other rule or so... but that's the plan xD
The MotM is a difficult one. I manipulate that a lot to try and keep my oldest player (striker) competitive, I'd say it works about 50% of the time subbing another player that's outperforming him, but it does tend to go to the top rated top scoring attacker.
Keeper being MotM is the fairest as that doesn't favour the 'best' teams.
Although that would be manipulated pretty quickly with players putting them on FK, Penalty and even playing them up front!
That's why the 1st criteria, will be the ratings,, so we will select x2 players, and at the end of the season we will sum the ratings achieved ..in the Tops I guess, and undo draws using MotM.... anothe roption would be sum them to the ratings somehow or find a alternative formula.... but thats the idea for now. :PThe MotM is a difficult one. I manipulate that a lot to try and keep my oldest player (striker) competitive, I'd say it works about 50% of the time subbing another player that's outperforming him, but it does tend to go to the top rated top scoring attacker.
Keeper being MotM is the fairest as that doesn't favour the 'best' teams.
Although that would be manipulated pretty quickly with players putting them on FK, Penalty and even playing them up front!
It does go back to the fact that an 8 or 9 star 100 goal a season forward WILL win any rating/MotM competition
As we've seen from all the complaints on the thread the main one is that an 'average' team can never win any of them and so all you get is people complaining that something isn't fair as they have no chance.
Now, I'm not saying I've a solution Khris but there must be some kind of contest where a player with an 80% - 100% team feels like it's worth trying to compete?
Got my thinking cap on here......
we should set a avq cap for participants then, still, leagues can be manipulated xD so yeah, isn't easy... but we have time to think in the formula or just suggesting different stuffs XD
Well, since there are no rules, the only things that someone can do if he really wants to have a good chance of winning those forum competions is to adapt with the flow (which includes quality manipulation, buying better players, and power training). I spoke a lot about how some participants had significant advanatages over others before. Quality cap will not be of any big improvement as such because quality manipulation is among the main deciding factors. Assists, Goals, Ratings, MoM.... all can be manipulated and some have manipulation as their routine seasonal thing, so they have that advantage. I already suggested that those users that won in 2 or 3 of the last consecutives of those specific forum competitions to not be allowed to participate for a 3rd or 4th consecutive time; while some of them might get angry or annoyed, it is one of the only ways to allow the others to have a better chance. Then, it will be up to others to make the effort; someone cannot just expect to come out top 3 in a compeition with a relatively 'crap' team too or without any investment or effort. Another option is to have 2 different groups for those competitions and split the tokens pool - one group for the past recent (last 2-3 seasons; one season tanking between two winning seasons not allowed) winners and one group for recent non-winners. There should be a minimum amount of participants too in relation to the amount of spots eligible for rewards; there cannot be only like 3-5 participants competiting for top 3 spots in a group.
Last edited by Tactician; 11-24-2019 at 06:51 PM.
How about biggest goal difference in a season?
Manipulable again xD...
I do not see where in the game (Android mobile version) the average rating of a player for a season is recorded and showed? The only displayed averages are those in the charts for League, Champions League/Super League and Cup. Those are not realiable as such when it comes to the average rating of players. So, I ask the question again how will you (Khris) track and record the average rating of all those players appropriately? First, you will unlikely see the match reports of all the participants, and secondly it is not something convenient (demanding, time-consuming and tiresome).
We could use, only the ratings of 2 players, if at the end of season they r in the top rated of L/CL/cup... and do something there, cause ofc. we cant stay posting here every single rating xD..
so, select 2 players, try the best to make them achieve the best ratings, and only count them if they reach the top. Thats an option.
18Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
