Season 130 - Are you ready?

[Max]

please don't ignore their experiences.

I see your point there but you see, even though they may be experienced, they won’t last more than a season anyway in my team and also, most of them will be retiring in 1-2 seasons, to me it is just a wasted investment. My team average age is 24. I have one or two oldies in my team for the “experience” and the rest are young, one of my youngest players has the most appearances, I think the older players don’t play as well, maybe one or two exceptions, the rest mostly were DC’s and got mediocre 7 ratings, nothing too special in my opinion.

[Nebu]

I see your point there but you see, even though they may be experienced, they won’t last more than a season anyway in my team and also, most of them will be retiring in 1-2 seasons, to me it is just a wasted investment. My team average age is 24. I have one or two oldies in my team for the “experience” and the rest are young, one of my youngest players has the most appearances, I think the older players don’t play as well, maybe one or two exceptions, the rest mostly were DC’s and got mediocre 7 ratings, nothing too special in my opinion.

I doubt if the game factors experience in its engine. You see 18 year olds scoring like a 28/30 year old player.



Sent from my SM-A720F using Tapatalk

[Max]

I doubt if the game factors experience in its engine. You see 18 year olds scoring like a 28/30 year old player.



Sent from my SM-A720F using Tapatalk

You are right, my young players play young than the old ones, what I can agree on is I wouldn’t be buying those players ever. The oldest player I might have is from 28/29 I rarely had an older player than that.

[khris]

I doubt if the game factors experience in its engine. You see 18 year olds scoring like a 28/30 year old player.



Sent from my SM-A720F using Tapatalk

The efficency isn't linked to the age, exactly.

The %s are added not depending on the age, but depending on the own contributive roles assigned inside the team.
Basically, and Ive experienced many times this situation, if you actually have, many contributive players and the Roles of contribution are covered, you will not find, a new player, that performs well, cause the contribution roles are limited.

You can not have 5 key players scoring 40 goals each, basically, so the roles are assigned, depending on the own team status, and at some point to allow a new "excellent" key player to join your team, first, you have to create the space for him.

Thats why a super player that comes from another team via negotiations can be vanished if we sign them, the good performance don't belong to the player itself, the engine will only assign a power inrelation with what he have arround when joins your squad, and this means that, his "power/performance" is limited by default.

[Nebu]

The efficency isn't linked to the age, exactly.

The %s are added not depending on the age, but depending on the own contributive roles assigned inside the team.
Basically, and Ive experienced many times this situation, if you actually have, many contributive players and the Roles of contribution are covered, you will not find, a new player, that performs well, cause the contribution roles are limited.

You can not have 5 key players scoring 40 goals each, basically, so the roles are assigned, depending on the own team status, and at some point to allow a new "excellent" key player to join your team, first, you have to create the space for him.

Thats why a super player that comes from another team via negotiations can be vanished if we sign them, the good performance don't belong to the player itself, the engine will only assign a power inrelation with what he have arround when joins your squad, and this means that, his "power/performance" is limited by default.

This means its not good to have too many good strikers, just 1 or 2 are enough. Because the rest will be supporting strikers. Am sure the same applies to the midfield and defence, all the players cannot make 10 rating in a match.

Sent from my SM-A720F using Tapatalk

[Rix]

I see your point there but you see, even though they may be experienced, they won’t last more than a season anyway in my team and also, most of them will be retiring in 1-2 seasons, to me it is just a wasted investment. My team average age is 24. I have one or two oldies in my team for the “experience” and the rest are young, one of my youngest players has the most appearances, I think the older players don’t play as well, maybe one or two exceptions, the rest mostly were DC’s and got mediocre 7 ratings, nothing too special in my opinion.

it was just sarcasm.

I was also having those bogus very old players in offering. so joked here.

[Max]

it was just sarcasm.

I was also having those bogus very old players in offering. so joked here.

Oh sorry, , I can’t believe I did not see it and it made me make an incorrect point lol, nearly April fools day haha.


Sent from my iPhone using by pressing the Reply button.