Originally Posted by
khris
Right now, a bad pairing, where opponent distances arent reachable, create a lot of rejection. For me a option always was to ensure promotion for teams that get a single 9* player. This would contain the AvQ margins, would create a limited space where to spend resources and a etc but whats planned, if works as expected, resolve some of the Big structural issues.
Will manipulation be over? No, and in the end we see how a known system that people can control until certain point, is the good choice.
Will spenders still spend? Probably yes, thats a personal option, but I always defended that this is so wrong right now in the way its done, without lĂmits and a excess of lack of sense if we Talk tactically, since profesional teams just turned into 1* defenders to gain margin and exploit the system.Boring and no punishment like deactivate defence bonuses in these cases.
Will non spenders be forced to spend? Right now we have issues with video availability, and the new pairings dont fix this but will reduce by far the differance between teams, so It should create something more fair.
And finally, theres a reality, and is that managers always, try to find the exploit to maximize the benefit. This will not be over, for sure.