Page 2 of 88 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 880
Like Tree216Likes

Thread: Table of Counter Formations v2.0 - Which formation to use?

  1. #11
    VIP July Fourth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    15,386
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy Carter View Post
    I dont need that table anymore..
    That table doesnt make me thinking about how to set counter strategy, not to counter formation with different formation..
    That's what I think. Useless... Football Managers should be using their own brain for their tactics, not anyone elses.
    *Retired From Top Eleven*

  2. #12
    Apprentice roni's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    209
    Great we all need it for new players like me it's very useful ,even tho i barely use counter formations.
    And i think 4-1-4-1 works good against 4-4-2 .
    Boys San :: Season 12 LV 12

    League 11 :: CL 8 :: Cup :: 3



  3. #13
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    16
    You can add the following to the table:

    4-1(DMC)-2(ML/MR)-2(AMC)-1

    I successfully countered this by using 3(N)-1-3-(N)-2(AML/AMR)-1 and I ended up beating a stronger opponent in the CL Final 3:1.
    Zaharia Cristian likes this.

  4. #14
    Wiki Contributor Incredipede's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Mount Everest
    Posts
    653
    Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
    That's what I think. Useless... Football Managers should be using their own brain for their tactics, not anyone elses.
    I agree with you, even though I sometimes really look at the table if I'm playing against a formation I've rarely play against. Sometimes the counter formations don't really work but well, blame T11.

    Anyways, many players were using your thread, so I decided to create a new one. Specially for the newer players such a thread was helpful.
    Last edited by Incredipede; 12-14-2013 at 09:39 AM.
    DiZZee likes this.

  5. #15
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    21
    not working anymore..
    sirokaca and TuninGGamer like this.

  6. #16
    Champion Dman2pt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Lisbon, portugal
    Posts
    2,459
    I still think it is usefull to give you a idea, then you have the option of using it or not.

    I think it is always better to put your Best players in and choose the tactic that Best fit on them.

    4141 was efective against mine 442, but then i easily beat him using 4222 hexágone.
    THIS GAME IS TO RANDOM! I STOP WAISTING MY TIME!

  7. #17
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2
    there is no word about 4-1-2-2-1 loop, i thought it was quite dangerous, but at my experience i beat it twice by Maple Leaf, 4-1 overall, 4 goal came from my mr/ml with red arrows. also i find Butterfly not really usefull against 442, couple of seasons it was real good counter, but now i got bad luck using this strategy, and game ends not so well as i expect - max is pretty close game with 50-50 ball possession. anyway good luck Incredipede for trying update old stats and sorry for my bad english

  8. #18
    Champion fadhul17's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    East java, Indonesia.
    Posts
    2,304
    Quote Originally Posted by July Fourth View Post
    That's what I think. Useless... Football Managers should be using their own brain for their tactics, not anyone elses.
    Totally agree!
    YOU're MANAGER, YOU MANAGE


    Congratulation Arsenal!!
    Hope these thread could help you, Formation-Tactic and GUIDE

  9. #19
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    16
    I'm curious why the counter-formation for 3W-1-3W-1-2 happens to be: 3W-2(DMC)-3N-1-1 Tower, 3N-5-2 Flat

    "3W-2(DMC)-3N-1-1 Tower" should be better by putting 4 in the back and taking out one DMC. "3N-5-2 Flat" seems like a more decent option, but I'm going to try a slight change by pushing the wide midfielders out to AML/AMR positions instead: 3(N)-3(MC)-2(AML/ARM)-2

    Will post how it goes!

  10. #20
    Newbie
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    16
    Quote Originally Posted by aster View Post
    I'm curious why the counter-formation for 3W-1-3W-1-2 happens to be: 3W-2(DMC)-3N-1-1 Tower, 3N-5-2 Flat

    "3W-2(DMC)-3N-1-1 Tower" should be better by putting 4 in the back and taking out one DMC. "3N-5-2 Flat" seems like a more decent option, but I'm going to try a slight change by pushing the wide midfielders out to AML/AMR positions instead: 3(N)-3(MC)-2(AML/ARM)-2

    Will post how it goes!
    Wow, at HT already 5-0 up and 79% possession.

Page 2 of 88 FirstFirst 12341252 ... LastLast