So everyone, I have only budgeted for one player on my second team this season. So my question is, which of the following players should I replace?
Attachment 123465
Attachment 123467
Printable View
So everyone, I have only budgeted for one player on my second team this season. So my question is, which of the following players should I replace?
Attachment 123465
Attachment 123467
Overall rating. But if you want to make a career in platinum, then white skills. Rake a close look at the players I trained today. https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...faa7f648bc.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...52b858b3a9.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...91281221eb.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...42d522cbba.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...1bc947c45e.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...d09c414288.jpg
also when you buy a youth player how many stars has in the beginning? thanks
Hey man, Gorbachev approximately 150. He had all of his positions and SA. I just raised his quality. From 78 (I think) to 120%.
Ronaldo from 118 to 148 with 220 greens.
Casti from 100 to 130 with 200.
Ruiz 150 greens from 90 ( If I'm not wrong)
Alver 100 greens (from 90 )
Boakye from 70% to 130% 200greens
I can't remember exactly the numbers :(
I have 300/400 tokens too. so for next season i would like to test your ideas.... i think that can work very well.... ok i follow your advise dont waste money in sa and positions
also before abot to start the quality for each player you test them (if is a fast trainer and you have few matches to understand is a good player or not)
@Khris
This is day 9 of my League.
I have 0 goals conceded so far and avg about 6-0.
Attachment 123883
Those are the defenders I use most in the League games
Attachment 123873
Attachment 123875
Attachment 123877
Attachment 123879
Attachment 123881
So the first two, Gonzalez and Prytz have better rates that Costacurta and Rikaard.
Does it mean that I must invest more to them ?
Hell no !
The other two are young, fast trainers, can have extra positions and good sa and gonna last more seasons.
Rates and stats of the game are overestimate.
There aren't "good" or "bad" players or form.
30% of the game is Luck, roll dice
30% is high quality good players
30% is watching and coaching
and 10% miscellaneous
The game has some patterns.
For example if you 're playing with wingers or 3 AM (AML-AMC-AMR), your (alone) ST will be a mediocre player.
Even if is +1 star above the wingers.
Only if you put him to take f-k, penalties or ck (to add some assists) will score or get better rates.
Now, if you 're playing 4-4-2 ND, one of the two STs will perform little better than the other.
If you 're playing 4-3-3 flat, one of the three STs will be total crap.
Yes, in those cases maybe hidden characteristics matter.
Don't know cause I don't use 2STs formations (only switching in emergency cases)
Height is cosmetic
What can affect your formation maybe is to put a back arrow in one ST and a forth arrow to the other.
Also the second one should have higher finishing and scoring skills than the other.
I also believe that height or foot doesn't matter.
I wrote that in my Mythbusters thread
https://forum.topeleven.com/top-elev...op-eleven.html
I had this argument with a friend, Noel, who 's an adm in a big TE fb group.
He has this player
Attachment 124001
ok, good but not unique because of his height or double feet.
My three attackers have 1.69, 1.75, 1.90.
Robinho with 1.75 is a super scorer, Weah, with 1.90, is the one I use for free-kicks, to win the top scorer in League.
But in CL has 3/11 so far.
(you can check them in my asso group #PEZCPY)
This kind of fullback will get several MOMs. But also without the ck SA a fullback with 200%+ crossing can get 3-4 per season.
Pure DCs indeed hardly ever become MOM or, for that matter, get marks higher than 7.https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...554f0a3b4e.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201...58a4f7a503.jpg
Inviato dal mio SM-A750FN utilizzando Tapatalk