Many say Quality is not the factor in this game, even the admin also say that, but...

[Ahlony Wong]

Quality is not key factor ??

ok...look at that.... this time is not what i say....your AM finally tell us the truth this time~

he is honest this time finally ~HAHAHA (btw, will this AM get fire for speaking the truth out? lol )



o...yea, look at the stars of my opposit in my CUP~

[nikolgiorgos]

For me quality is one of the three major factors (the other two are presence of the manager in the game/coaching and luck ).
Of course the q of a player must come together with the good performance in the field.

[Gabez Teh]

I have a cup manipulator player Sometimes he is playing a whole match against normal teams (not abandons)

i had to realize most important factor is form when you are playing against similar or not so strong(er) player of course if you are playing with low star team against 9-"10"* star team you gonna lose in long term

behold:

[Fcgrfr]

quality is the main key factor, that's why this game became a treasure-green packs hunt, so the managers are looking for tricks to gain more and more...

[Gabez Teh]

And his goal against 7* GK

he is somewhere between -3 and -4* if i'm doing teh math good

[nikolgiorgos]

As we can see the first pic of Ahlony, if this team had also a 1* player, it wouldn't make much difference
but you can't go far with a team of 3-4-5* players (but good performers)

[nash123]

Quality doesn't matter, if it's close enough. I think, range is around 20-30%. Everything else is just luck and tactic.

Look at this... Chri is a FA member and RL-friend. He is the weakest active manager... but do you think, 5 points to 3.place is only luck? Btw... he made 4 points vs the strongest team, Znan (beside me).
He made 3 points vs 4th (2nd game isn't played)
He made 4 points vs 5th
He made 3 points vs 6th
He made 3 points vs 7th (2nd game isn't played)
and so on.

[Albator1]

For me quality is one of the three major factors (the other two are presence of the manager in the game/coaching and luck ).
Of course the q of a player must come together with the good performance in the field.

I disagree...i am always present in the game...and i lose regulary from better teams, specialy in the cup and CL. Even if i win first game 2:0 against player 2lvls above...i lose 5:1 in return. In this tipe of competition its imposible to win in 2 games.For me its much easier to win against murinho then the other stronger teams. Since this is all about software i exclude the luck.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока

[Albator1]

I disagree...i am always present in the game...and i lose regulary from better teams, specialy in the cup and CL. Even if i win first game 2:0 against player 2lvls above...i lose 5:1 in return. In this tipe of competition its imposible to win in 2 games.For me its much easier to win against murinho then the other stronger teams. Since this is all about software i exclude the luck.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока

I agree about quality.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока

[Albator1]

Quality doesn't matter, if it's close enough. I think, range is around 20-30%. Everything else is just luck and tactic.

Look at this... Chri is a FA member and RL-friend. He is the weakest active manager... but do you think, 5 points to 3.place is only luck? Btw... he made 4 points vs the strongest team, Znan (beside me).
He made 3 points vs 4th (2nd game isn't played)
He made 4 points vs 5th
He made 3 points vs 6th
He made 3 points vs 7th (2nd game isn't played)
and so on.

In the league i could even agree with you but CL and cup...no.

Послато са GT-I8200 уз помоћ Тапатока